<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Guilty Pleasure…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>mikey1969</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 04, 2014 10:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I have fun with this movie, it's good for some one liners and some fights. Action scenes as well. I've watched far worse movies as a paying customer at the theater. This one has always been a freebie, the only cost was my time, and once again, I've seen worse.<br />
I think it deserves better than a 5.2</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/211366/guilty-pleasure</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 01:58:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/211366.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 11:11:21 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Guilty Pleasure… on Fri, 01 May 2026 11:11:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>StanleyGodSpeed</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 11, 2017 08:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I would agree with that. Classic early 90's action mixed in with the charms of the two lead actors.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777047</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777047</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 11:11:22 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>