<![CDATA[(spoilers)Characters Better off Never Having Robbed the Bank?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man

BoogieKnight — 18 years ago(March 01, 2008 03:28 AM)

I think it's definately a fair question, The Old Man is dead, JImmy, Jack, and Jose are dead, Lulu is a widow and the bar is trashed, plus Marlboro gets shot twice in the same arm. Harley leaves town and Marlboro does who knows what. Yet they basically give it a happy ending.
Sure the drug running scumbags would have taken over and pushed more drugs into the world, but all these guys wanted to do was save their bar, certainly not get killed trying to stop the drug flow into the country. Wouldn't they have just been better off doing something else and ditching the bar in the first place? Ah well, sorry to be a big ol bring-down.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/211440/spoilers-characters-better-off-never-having-robbed-the-bankRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 09:45:38 GMTFri, 01 May 2026 11:20:05 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to (spoilers)Characters Better off Never Having Robbed the Bank? on Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:12 GMT]]>TheLordofTheHarvest — 12 years ago(September 10, 2013 01:01 AM)

They didn't have the greatest robbery sense in the world, they left the tracker in the suitcase and that left them out in the open to be tracked. They didn't even stop to look for it. Plus they asked for the exact amount of the money owed, which would have gave them away when they payed it back to the bank. If they asked for $3,000,001 instead of $2,500,000 they might have gotten away. Might's a big word in this case.
It wasn't thought out very well to say the least.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777556https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777556Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to (spoilers)Characters Better off Never Having Robbed the Bank? on Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:11 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777555https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777555Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to (spoilers)Characters Better off Never Having Robbed the Bank? on Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:10 GMT]]>dpm-5 — 17 years ago(May 26, 2008 11:27 AM)

Better to be dead and cool than alive and uncool. 🙂

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777554https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777554Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to (spoilers)Characters Better off Never Having Robbed the Bank? on Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:09 GMT]]>Maniac-9 — 17 years ago(May 16, 2008 08:57 PM)

Well considering most of them would still be alive, they would've definitely been better off not robbing the armored car.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777553https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777553Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to (spoilers)Characters Better off Never Having Robbed the Bank? on Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:07 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777552https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777552Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to (spoilers)Characters Better off Never Having Robbed the Bank? on Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:06 GMT]]>gilbere71 — 18 years ago(March 29, 2008 02:02 PM)

Ah, hindsight is a wonderful thing 🙂
The Gunslinger smiled. "On the way to the Dark Tower," he said, "anything is possible."

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777551https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1777551Fri, 01 May 2026 11:20:06 GMT