<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[PG Rating?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Only the Lonely</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Lakemystery3</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 12, 2016 09:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This received a PG rating back in 1991 even with the F-bomb being dropped. I know it's a family movie, and one of my favorites, but even with Sal's (Bilushi) language and John Candy saying FU to his brother at the tux shop I would think this would be PG-13 at best.  I'm no pride about language, but I'm '91 with this kind of language?  I'm surprised it was given a PG.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/211598/pg-rating</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 17:03:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/211598.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 11:42:05 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to PG Rating? on Fri, 01 May 2026 11:42:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>marvelass</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 19, 2016 05:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Don't forget the locker room scene with the one naked guy. The thing is, we've become more prudish and conservative as a nation post-9/11. Many '70s, '80s, and '90s films wouldn't be made today, lest someone be offended.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1778788</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1778788</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 11:42:06 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>