<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Good Luck Chuck…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Pure Luck</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>saturns1stmoon</strong> — <em>18 years ago(September 07, 2007 08:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">the 1st time i saw the previews for the new Jessica Alba "film" Good Luck Chuck i thought of this movie.<br />
looks like pretty much the same premise with obvious changes.<br />
another "retelling" or something<br />
i'm sure it will be garbage but Pure Luck was hardly Shakespeare.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/211709/good-luck-chuck</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 02:20:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/211709.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 11:53:16 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Good Luck Chuck… on Fri, 01 May 2026 11:53:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jnbfwc</strong> — <em>16 years ago(June 15, 2009 08:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You're wrong. The premise is ENTIRELY wrong.<br />
Having 'luck' play a part in a movie does not make it similar to every other movie with luck being a part of it.<br />
That is, unless every movie with action sequences is the exact same plot and premise of every other movie with action sequences.<br />
We all know that such is a silly idea, though.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1779424</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1779424</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 11:53:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>