<![CDATA[underrated]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Shattered

illnino40311 — 19 years ago(April 10, 2006 07:37 PM)

This is a great movie that needs to be seen by more people.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/211940/underratedRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 21:39:28 GMTFri, 01 May 2026 12:27:12 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:35 GMT]]>heelmaster2000 — 9 years ago(July 10, 2016 08:27 AM)

I also agree with OP.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781316https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781316Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:34 GMT]]>memo-4 — 11 years ago(September 02, 2014 12:48 AM)

excellent noir-ish mind bender thriller lost in years by a very apt Wolfgang Petersen.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781315https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781315Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:32 GMT]]>htownsteve — 11 years ago(May 22, 2014 09:08 PM)

I enjoyed this movie immensely. Some of it was silly, but no sillier than Norman Bates and his dead mother. I gave it an 8.
Son, you can't polish a turd

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781314https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781314Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:31 GMT]]>memo-4 — 11 years ago(April 30, 2014 11:46 AM)

really awesome film,RIP Mr Hoskins..

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781313https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781313Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:30 GMT]]>octopusmagnificens — 11 years ago(April 30, 2014 06:20 AM)

I agree.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781312https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781312Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:29 GMT]]>sllamb-1 — 12 years ago(February 11, 2014 10:21 PM)

Couldn't agree more! Still remember I was shocked when I saw that important scene whereas the main lead discovers the truth.
Nowadays, more and more movies want to have a twist but audience are not that easily surprised anymore.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781311https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781311Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:28 GMT]]>molypocho — 12 years ago(January 01, 2014 02:34 PM)

I agree. I enjoyed the hell out of this film. Love the Hitchcock-heavy feel. It's too bad about the film's implausibility: Tom Berenger's character managing to pass as his lover's husband. Maybe if more time had been dealt with the sneaking suspicions of the husband's former friends it could have been pulled off. Of course Peterson didn't follow this route because he didn't want to give away his twist. Just another example of a director giving up depth and insight for a gee-whiz, gosh-pow ending. Too bad.
My rating; 9

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781310https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781310Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:27 GMT]]>bayardhiler — 12 years ago(April 21, 2013 09:45 PM)

A little flawed perhaps, but still, an underrated gem if there ever was one.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781309https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781309Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:26 GMT]]>teddecker — 13 years ago(March 13, 2013 12:25 PM)

So many never heard of this Movie. I thought Tom Bearenger was really good in it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781308https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781308Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:25 GMT]]>aef-6 — 15 years ago(May 12, 2010 12:14 AM)

I agree, very enjoyable and probably this is my fav. twist in a movie.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781307https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781307Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:24 GMT]]>Pmdmnym — 9 years ago(November 07, 2016 10:23 PM)

Exactly!!! Why even watch anything? I agree 100%
Wait! Wait! Where are you going? I was gonna make Espresso!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781306https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781306Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:23 GMT]]>liliana_rhasoc — 11 years ago(October 25, 2014 10:59 AM)

I love this comment. I like the movie a lot.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781305https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781305Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:22 GMT]]>ecavuto — 13 years ago(January 13, 2013 10:50 AM)

If you're going to invalidate movies because of their being unrealistic then you may as well wipe out every movie ever made-especially the many bio pics that rarely seem to get the person's life story right! SHATTERED is an enjoyable and suspenseful film. The performances are great, the characters are interesting, the plot twists are fascinating, the scenery is captivating.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781304https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781304Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:21 GMT]]>norberte-1 — 11 years ago(August 05, 2014 05:50 PM)

I agree, it was underrated.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781303https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781303Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:20 GMT]]>plwblj — 16 years ago(December 13, 2009 08:12 PM)

Most definitely !

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781302https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781302Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:19 GMT]]>plwblj — 17 years ago(July 01, 2008 02:01 PM)

It is under-rated even if flawed !

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781301https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781301Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:18 GMT]]>BigEmpty — 18 years ago(September 10, 2007 06:00 PM)

Underrated?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781300https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781300Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:17 GMT]]>starwalker_az — 18 years ago(July 03, 2007 02:24 AM)

You think this is underrated? The viewer is betrayed with what wishes it was an O. Henry ending, but fails miserably. If I had seen this in a movie theater, I would have demanded my money back. Since my wife got it through Netflix, it is just a bump in the road. The screenwriter should be tarred and feathered and run out of town on a rail. Wouldn't it have been a hoot when "Dan Merrick" went to the hospital, and they gave him blood based on his medical records and he died? Fingerprints, blood type, trying to fake being an architect, different voice, just way too many idiotic parts to ignore.
You can't fix stupid - Ron White

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781299https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781299Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:16 GMT]]>tanner3212001 — 19 years ago(July 12, 2006 03:36 PM)

Hilarious one liner but I disagree I really like this movie.
I've got a job, a secretary, a mother, two ex-wives and several bartenders that depend upon me

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781298https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781298Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:15 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781297https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781297Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to underrated on Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:14 GMT]]>Davejohnson316 — 19 years ago(May 16, 2006 07:45 PM)

I agree, very good movie indeed.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781296https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1781296Fri, 01 May 2026 12:27:14 GMT