<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Nun had nice tits]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Bad Lieutenant</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>daedalus1337</strong> — <em>14 years ago(August 03, 2011 08:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/212605/nun-had-nice-tits</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 08:45:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/212605.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Nun had nice tits on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dixiebandit69</strong> — <em>12 years ago(June 24, 2013 07:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I liked her bush most of all.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786862</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786862</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Nun had nice tits on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Beau_Buffet</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 09, 2016 12:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And nuns usually don't look like models.<br />
How on earth would you come to this conclusion?<br />
90% of nuns could have heavenly bodies, for all we know.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786861</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786861</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Nun had nice tits on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hetairai</strong> — <em>12 years ago(June 12, 2013 08:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The scene of the nun being examined by a doctor just seemed gratuitousshowing her entirely naked, with a perfect body, etc. For one thing, normally a doctor would keep a rape victim as covered as possible so she doesn't feel like she's being violated a second time. And nuns usually don't look like models.<br />
The only possible legit reason I can think of is that maybe the director was trying to make us, the audience, into leering voyeurs like Keitel's character, but that doesn't seem to fit with the rest of the movie. Or maybe the lieutenant saw her as "perfect" and blameless and that was reflected in his image of this nunthat might fit, but I don't know. Probably just fan service</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786860</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786860</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Nun had nice tits on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>franzkabuki</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 21, 2012 03:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No idea why Ferrara thought that the nun should have a body like someone from Baywatch. Obviously, this guy has never shied away from stuffing his films with often gratuitous nudity, but this here really seems puzzlingly out of place.<br />
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786859</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786859</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Nun had nice tits on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>janken_el_grande</strong> — <em>14 years ago(January 28, 2012 09:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Heavenly!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786858</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786858</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Nun had nice tits on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>creepingdeath91</strong> — <em>14 years ago(February 02, 2012 03:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Holy <em>beep</em> Was the OP actually Roger Ebert?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786857</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786857</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Nun had nice tits on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786856</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786856</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Nun had nice tits on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786855</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1786855</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:07:28 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>