<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Boobs?!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Captain Ron</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>petergriffin1919</strong> — <em>20 years ago(June 16, 2005 12:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm not some weird parent or anything, i was just wondering, how is this movie rated pg-13 when you can clearly see mary kay  places tits in the shower scene?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/212804/boobs</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 01:04:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/212804.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>turnstile78</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 09, 2016 02:13 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Daryl Hannah bared her chest, as a mermaid, in Splash(1984). PG rated. Distributed by Disney!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788547</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788547</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Dan_Garten</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 03, 2016 05:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Next to Vacation (1983), is this the only mainstream comedy containing mom nudity?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788546</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788546</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>thecalhouns</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 11, 2016 01:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was pretty damn shocked that you see the mom naked, but I'm not complaining!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788545</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788545</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Psychological_Gold</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 27, 2016 10:24 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think bare breasts seen in the shower or getting dressed merit a PG-13 rating. I think if the breasts are shown as part of a sex scene that merits an R rating.<br />
But weren't they having sex in the shower?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788544</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788544</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jefgg</strong> — <em>11 years ago(July 18, 2014 05:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think bare breasts seen in the shower or getting dressed merit a PG-13 rating.  I think if the breasts are shown as part of a sex scene that merits an R rating.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788543</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788543</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JrnlofEddieDeezenStudies</strong> — <em>15 years ago(December 19, 2010 05:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">My complaint would be that boobs typically get an R, not the other way around.<br />
<a href="http://www.rateyourmusic.com/~JrnlofEddieDeezenStudies" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.rateyourmusic.com/~JrnlofEddieDeezenStudies</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788542</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788542</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Nakrophile</strong> — <em>16 years ago(April 03, 2010 09:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't know, but thinking of the BBFC again and strange 12 certificates, I watched The Conversazione again and remembered how there is essentially a naked lady in it, where you can clearly see her breasts and more or less make out some finer details below.  I guess because it is n shadow they accepted it, but I find it interesting regardless.  That film definitely deserves a 15, I think.  Eh.<br />
"We may be trapped."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788541</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788541</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sonicbro316</strong> — <em>19 years ago(January 18, 2007 06:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wasn't there a story on IMDB a few days ago about the MPAA revising their system, thanks to that "This Film Is Not Yet Rated"?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788540</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788540</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788539</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788539</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Nakrophile</strong> — <em>16 years ago(March 25, 2010 07:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I find the BBFC's classification of the fklm even more interesting than the MPAA's.<br />
I know there are apparently boobs in the extended cut of terminator 4 on DVD, which I think is also a 12, and as far as I was aware that was the first time the BBFC passed them for a 12, and I think even then it is in the rain and from a distance.<br />
Back to Captain Ron: it's not just the boobs either.  There are loads of dirty jokes throughout, and Captain Ron seems almost like a paedophile for the first ten or so minutes he is in the film as he is talking to the daughter.  Loads of really unsubtle sex references throughout and plenty of sh<em>ts as well as the fu</em>k.  And holy crap, the camcorder scene!  Amazing.<br />
Kurt Russell forever.<br />
"We may be trapped."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788538</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788538</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MovieBro</strong> — <em>19 years ago(October 23, 2006 07:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Isn't the MPAA wonderful.NOT.<br />
Leonidas: Spartans! Tonight, we dine in hell!(300):3/9/07</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788537</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788537</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>moviefiend-1</strong> — <em>19 years ago(October 16, 2006 08:23 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i was surprised the dvd in the uk is rated 12but there's clearly tits in it, weird.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788536</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788536</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ragreen259</strong> — <em>19 years ago(October 02, 2006 05:20 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Seeing as T&amp;A are shown to elementary school children in film classes with no parental permission (give a look at the Romeo &amp; Juliet board), I would say it doesn't make any difference, apparently. A lot depends on what's going on with those body parts.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788535</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788535</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788534</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788534</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BbaySMH</strong> — <em>15 years ago(April 25, 2010 07:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The MPAA has no actual rules and their rating depends on who's making it &amp; who's in it.  For instance "Hannibal" can get away with a lot more violence then some indie film with a no-name cast that has way less.  Anyone that's ever dealt with the MPAA will say the samething and this is brought up on just about every other director's commentary on DVDs.  One F-bomb is not the rule and loads of movies have more then one, and I don't mean PG-13 films from the mid-80's.  "As Good As It Gets" is PG-13 and has a total of 4 F-bombs in it.  That's what happens when Hollywood powerhouses like James L. Brooks and Jack Nicholson are on board (and this is on top of brief/partial nudity &amp; just about every word out of Melvin's mouth).  Take away the big names and the movie would likely have been cut just to get an R-rating, let alone a PG-13.  Again, it may sound like my opinion, but it's all been gathered from 100's of hours of listening to director's talking about the MPAA and that's exactly the way they put it.  Then again if Nicholson wanted to, he could likely make a PG rated snuff film, he DOES have that much power in that city.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788533</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788533</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788532</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788532</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bobncarla</strong> — <em>20 years ago(March 14, 2006 05:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You can say the 'F' word ONLY ONCE in a movie and it will be rated PG-13 (see 'Walk The Line' or 'Mr. &amp; Mrs. Smith'), and also brief nudity is warrented as PG-13.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788531</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788531</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>stgekng</strong> — <em>14 years ago(May 17, 2011 12:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The 1700's called they want their morals back.<br />
'I want to be what I was when I wanted to be what I am now'</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788530</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788530</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788529</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788529</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ladystorm282001</strong> — <em>20 years ago(October 29, 2005 04:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Because the moral makeup of movies has been degraded since the good clean movies of the 50's and 60's. It seems like its not a good movie anymore if they don't put some sort of brief nudity or just plan nudity. It really ruins the films sometimes. <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61e.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--disappointed" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":(" alt="😞" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788528</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788528</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>INfinity</strong> — <em>20 years ago(October 08, 2005 11:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">or take the example of the invisible kid from the 80s. kids movie but there's a scene where he goes into the girls locker room whilst invisible and there's lots of nudity on display. quite surprising.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788527</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788527</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>vinniewheaton</strong> — <em>17 years ago(July 19, 2008 09:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">what are you a HIPPIE nudists should set on fire well at least the ugly ones .                                                                                there aint nothing like being behind the wheel of your own car  except mayybee for pussy</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788526</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788526</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>oasis27gallagher</strong> — <em>20 years ago(September 11, 2005 09:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">they didn't mark the film for an r rating because:<br />
it is not wrong to show people where infants recieve milk to live.  There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.  human nature.  personaly, I have no clue why/when in time it became wrong for others to see a woman's chest.  think about it, seriously, what's wrong with seeing the very thing that keeps an infant alive?  lol, whatever.<br />
I'm glad they kept it in the film, because it makes the scene more tense and funny, you know, when captain ron storms in, lol.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788525</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788525</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Boobs?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>yf4e10</strong> — <em>20 years ago(July 25, 2005 01:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I dunno, But in TITanic, i was delighted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788524</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1788524</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 14:38:03 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>