That’s not what pedophilia is

16? Holy ****, man; that's the prime age. You think of your high school days and this age is the most ****able. Lucky mudda fugga…

This message has been deleted.

DavidW1947 A lot of confusion is caused by the authorites insisting that anyone under the age of 18 years, even if they are 17 and married, is a child, when, in fact, they are a young adult.
I think the law trumps your card dude

I'd just like to point out the misuse of the word paedophile (or pedophile) in this thread. The word describes someone who is sexually attracted to children who are pre-pubescent, that, is aged 12 years and under. A paedophile would not be interested in teenagers or either sex, certainly not anyone aged 15 or 17. I am amazed at the number of people who don't know this. It has nothing to do with any age of consent. Even if the age of consent were increased to 45, a paedophile still wouldn't be interested in a 44 year old.
A lot of confusion is caused by the authorites insisting that anyone under the age of 18 years, even if they are 17 and married, is a child, when, in fact, they are a young adult.

wow thats cool.
How did you meet?

Yes I am!

are you still with him?

well, I came of age in the 70's, and that was the law then, so I'd say quite a while. I was 17 and having sex with a 28 year old man. Nobody could do a damn thing about it because I was of age.

when did that change?

In New York, the legal age of consent is 17 for both girls and boys.

in some states its legal but gay love HECK NO!
its 18 across the board
Yeah his perv like Roman Polanski

About a year ago, I started doing a lot of genealogical research for my family. Turns out, two of my great-grandmothers got married at the ripe old age of 14. Both had 2-3 kids by the time they were 20, and these ladies would have been contemporaries of Chaplin's wives. Back then, people weren't as concerned about putting a specific age on being an adult. Once a girl was sexually mature, she would get married, whether she was 14, 16, or 18. Of course, we can make the argument that just because a person is sexually mature doesn't mean that they're emotionally ready for the demands of being a wife and a mother. But it seems a little unfair and myopic to treat Chaplin like a monster when his choices, although arguably unusual, were not too far out of the realm of possibilities.

He was an epheobophile actually
You killed Captain Clown, YOU KILLED CAPTAIN CLOWN-The Joker on Batman TAS

I don't think Charlie was a pedophile, times were different then and I'm not saying that like it's okay because its disgusting to me, I'm a 24 yr old female and could never imagine myself with a man old enough to be my father. I prefer men who were born in my own decade and heck I was born at the end of the 80s I would want someone close to that year. Anyway, I think Charlie had issues with women, maybe due to his mother?, plus his first love Was young and that ended tragically so I'm assuming that had an effect on his future choices in women. Also old dudes always married young women back in the day, gross to me for the most part but times were different and what may have gotten a little bit more of a pass back then wouldn't be acceptable today and vice versa.
Lonely Chicago pie

This message has been deleted.

No, pedophiles are attracted to prepubescents, not teenagers.
This will be the high point of my day; it's all downhill from here.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.