Just because you can only think of one reason doesn't mean there aren't more

I can only think of one reason why you would all be complaining about this, but I am not going to say it.
When I was in grade school, they asked me what I wanted to be when I grew up. I wrote down HAPPY.

I was just looking at renting this I'm totally surprised this isn't rated R!! Seriously, not ok.

Only in your opinion

The MPAA was thinking, "Must be great because it's directed by Attenborough the director of Gandhi," failing to appreciate that RA was a mediocre director who was fortunate to make boring movies about the greats who were so fascinating they made up for his mediocrity

I agree. Never seen so many boobs in a PG-13 movie. I thought Titanic was too gratuitous for the MPAAnot realizing this had already been released by then. What other PG/PG-13 movies have this many boobs? I can't think of any.
Mirror inspector is a job I could really see myself doing.

I don't understand why it's not PG. Nudity shouldn't give a movie any rating higher than PG except it has a strong sexual content and this movie has almost zero sexual content. MPAA is too much oversensitive in rating films with nudity.

This is definitely the most T & A that I've ever seen in a PG-13.

20'S and 30'slots of bare breasts and clingy dresses without any underwear. That was before the Hayes office and all of its censorship that stultified film in the 50's. Of course, for the past 20's years it's been the oppositegratuitous nudity and there must be a sex scene in every film (ho hum, snore)

"ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED??!!"
Maximus Decimus Meridius

It's only breasts, not sex. Relax.

A few scenes but not too much.
Its that man again!!