<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Greetings all!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Damage</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>nware-2</strong> — <em>11 years ago(August 17, 2014 09:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Greetings all!<br />
I've seen advertisements for an uncut version of this film but I noticed that both versions clock a total of 1 hour and 51 minutes.  Are there really any significant differences?  I imagine the uncut version is more explicit, but I highly doubt a few extra seconds can make the original more compelling.  I love this film and think it's criminally underrated.  I'd appreciate any insight someone gave me on this comparison.  Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/213259/greetings-all</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 22:38:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/213259.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 15:46:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Greetings all! on Fri, 01 May 2026 15:46:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>thewickermanuk</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 16, 2014 06:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's one of my top films also.  You're right one of the lovemaking scenes in the uncut version is more brutal and violent than the uncut one by no more than some seconds.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1792270</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1792270</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 15:46:23 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>