<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[RE:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — HouseSitter</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>smartgggg</strong> — <em>22 years ago(January 30, 2004 04:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I won't go "ahead", I am actually having something in common with you. For "some" "apparent" reason, I like 'Housesitter' too. It fits in a not clearly and fully definable category, which also contains, e.g., 'Overboard', 'Tin men' and 'Planes, trains and automobiles'. They're about 'ordinary' people, living 'ordinary lives', but the intrigues are not ordinary at all. Maybe they're silly, but they're presented and played in such a way that I really like them! Perhaps it's because I can really relate to at least one of the main characters.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/213561/re</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:47:42 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/213561.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 16:30:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to RE: on Fri, 01 May 2026 16:30:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rainbowfever64</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 21, 2014 12:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Good movie</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1794679</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1794679</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 16:30:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>