<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Only a 5.7?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — HouseSitter</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>firemandan72</strong> — <em>16 years ago(May 06, 2009 08:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ok it's not the best comedy in the world and a little contrived with a twee ending but surely it deserves more than a 5.7 ?<br />
It's Steve Martin at his best (17 years ago mind you) and he is on similar form to his 80's classics and almost improv comedy from Dirty Rotten Scoundrels.<br />
Just puzzled how all it got was 5.7.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/213597/only-a-5-7</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:59:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/213597.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 16:32:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Only a 5.7? on Fri, 01 May 2026 16:32:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Logic404</strong> — <em>16 years ago(February 17, 2010 12:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If we start listening to IMDb to our go to guide for quality movies then we have lost. I rated this a 7 and if you look at the voting breakdown a lot of people also gave this a 7. As an average a 5.7 isn't too bad.<br />
There are alot of people that don't even watch a movie and just rate it a 1 for spite. Maybe they don't like an actor or there's an issue with something trivial in the film and BOOM! - a rating of 1.<br />
I strongly believe 1's and 10's shouldn't be thrown around with ease. I rate a 1 ONLY on the worst of the worst and a 10 on the best of the best. In my voting history I barely have any 1's and 10's as ratings because simply put - most movies don't deserve these extremes.<br />
On just about every board on IMDb there is a question of why a movie is rated so high or so low. The real reason behind this is because 50% or so of people that rate movies aren't rating them properly or are too young to have seen enough movies to have a well rounded opinion.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1794816</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1794816</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 16:32:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Only a 5.7? on Fri, 01 May 2026 16:32:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>crazy13791</strong> — <em>16 years ago(October 23, 2009 09:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">yeah..even i think it desrved a 7.2 or something..<br />
All Time Favoutite Movies : Schindler's List and Diarios de Motocicleta</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1794815</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1794815</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 16:32:41 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>