<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Court procedures involving witnesses.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — My Cousin Vinny</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>estcst-3</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 05, 2016 05:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Any lawyers here? I'm wondering if a witness in a trail would be allowed to sit in the gallery after testifying or not. When Gambini is using the tape measure for the eye site test I'm pretty sure we see Tipton in with the spectators. Would this normally be allowed?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/213888/court-procedures-involving-witnesses</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 21:17:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/213888.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:18:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Court procedures involving witnesses. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:18:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mikeyg24</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 12, 2016 07:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Like the Sheriff and Wilbur who were advised they were still under oath.<br />
Hey! You're not old enough to drink! Now go and die for your country!!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797330</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797330</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:18:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Court procedures involving witnesses. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:18:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JosephASpadaro</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 07, 2016 05:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You specifically asked about<br />
after<br />
the witness testifies.<br />
That's not so clear-cut.<br />
Yes, a witness will leave the stand.  And he will be "finished" testifying.<br />
However, we don't know if he might be called back again later, for some reason.<br />
So, it's not always that clear-cut and "black and white" that the witness is in fact "finished" testifying.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797329</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797329</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:18:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Court procedures involving witnesses. on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:18:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JosephASpadaro</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 07, 2016 05:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Generally speaking, anyone in the public  including a witness  would be allowed to sit in on the trial.<br />
Now, one side or the other can request that the judge prevent that.<br />
Sometimes that is done so that one witness (let's say Witness #2) cannot get the benefit of hearing the testimony of another witness (let's say Witness #1).<br />
So, one of the lawyers  and the judge  will not want Witness #2 to hear what Witness #1 has to say.  The fear being that Witness #2 will change his story to make sure that it "matches" what Witness #1 said.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797328</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797328</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:18:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>