<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Better than &#x27;When Harry Met Sally&#x27;]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Prelude to a Kiss</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>velvoofell</strong> — <em>16 years ago(March 22, 2010 03:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">A far more accomplished and elegaic film - and if you can hold it together in the bar scene when Van Morrison starts playing, your a bigger person than me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/213934/better-than-when-harry-met-sally</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 11:38:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/213934.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:42 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better than &#x27;When Harry Met Sally&#x27; on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>eban1981</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 27, 2014 10:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In some spots of the movie, becomes better due to some points of improvement of Meg Ryan she was more freely had more flexibility, nimbleness and more is at these points is that Meg Ryan demonstrates high capacity, effervescence and a comfortable safety of seeing a Meg Ryan pleasantly calm and balanced.<br />
The Problem is that Meg into ''blockbuster movies'' she acts in a very hitched way.<br />
This damages balance, becoming very unstable, vulnerable and weepy<br />
'Harry and Sally' is arguably unbeatable  but there are points in this movie that Meg makes this movie enhancements.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797766</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797766</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better than &#x27;When Harry Met Sally&#x27; on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>intofilm</strong> — <em>13 years ago(April 23, 2012 06:53 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I much preferred When Harry Met Sally.  I do "get" this movie; it is an interesting notion.  Definitely the idea of one person inhabiting another and the benefits and disadvantages of that is something that lends itself to the movies more than any other medium.  I think A.B. does a very good job, though Meg Ryan seemed in over her head, and I found the scenes with the old guy to be really tiresome.<br />
WHMS doesn't have as "deep" a premise, but it seemed a lot more engaging to me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797765</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797765</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better than &#x27;When Harry Met Sally&#x27; on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jealous_Skunk</strong> — <em>14 years ago(December 08, 2011 09:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Are you * effing kidding me?!?!<br />
JeSkuNk</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797764</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797764</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better than &#x27;When Harry Met Sally&#x27; on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>vinidici</strong> — <em>14 years ago(October 31, 2011 08:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The OP has to be joking.  "Prelude" is slow-moving and has most of the bad stuff about "chick flicks" and few of the good.  WHMS is funny, clever, sad, bittersweet, thoughtful and probably the best romantic comedy made during the last thirty years.<br />
Whatever you do, DO NOT read this sigACKKK!!!<br />
TOO LATE!!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797763</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797763</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Better than &#x27;When Harry Met Sally&#x27; on Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>marshjes</strong> — <em>15 years ago(July 13, 2010 07:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I have to disagree. I love love love When Harry Met Sally. This movie was cute and thoughtful, but I didn't feel the passion between the two lead characters as I did during WHMS. When I say passion, I meant the initial disgust, hatred, sadness, loneliness, and the final payoff.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797762</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1797762</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 17:26:43 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>