<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Should eligibility requirements for President be amended]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Politics</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Vlad.</strong> — <em>4 years ago(December 01, 2021 04:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">So Kyle “no mercy” Rittenhouse can be elected?<br />
Stop.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/21481/should-eligibility-requirements-for-president-be-amended</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 22:41:03 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/21481.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:49 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should eligibility requirements for President be amended on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>polsci</strong> — <em>4 years ago(December 05, 2021 12:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't see a need for a younger minimum age requirement for president. No one even as young as the current minimum has ever been elected.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226599</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226599</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should eligibility requirements for President be amended on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Donna Acacia</strong> — <em>4 years ago(December 04, 2021 03:36 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think you should meet your MAKER! Psychic freak!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226598</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226598</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should eligibility requirements for President be amended on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>WarrenPeace</strong> — <em>4 years ago(December 03, 2021 05:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah.<br />
They will have to have been elected into any office for a maximum of at least two years.<br />
And they cannot have resigned from any office for however long they held it for.<br />
This should keep out any future brain dead celebs, such as Turd Face, from ever running again.<br />
I dunno why they are not working on this when there is buzz that he is thinking of running again as well as other under qualified celebs.<br />
"Please vote to preserve the unique character of Warren…" - Robert Duvall</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226597</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226597</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should eligibility requirements for President be amended on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>King David</strong> — <em>4 years ago(December 03, 2021 04:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It should be changed so people with Alzheimer's can't be elected.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226596</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226596</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should eligibility requirements for President be amended on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Rittenhouse The Righteous</strong> — <em>4 years ago(December 06, 2021 10:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's unlikely any kind of scrutiny of a voter's ability to vote would ever pass, but at this point, I'd take anything over the current system. Most people are politically and economically illiterate, hence Biden's win.<br />
Check my block list because you're probably on it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226595</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226595</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should eligibility requirements for President be amended on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>scottsmith81</strong> — <em>4 years ago(December 03, 2021 07:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Would it be crazy to require property ownership to be eligible to vote? Like real estate, not just a car. The colonies tried it. Didn't go so well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226594</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226594</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Should eligibility requirements for President be amended on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Rittenhouse The Righteous</strong> — <em>4 years ago(December 01, 2021 05:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's not the man headed for the Whitehouse that needs to pass a test come election time, it's the electorate.<br />
Democracy doesn't work when indoctrinated idiots get to vote.<br />
Check my block list because you're probably on it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226593</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/226593</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:12:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>