<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[7.2 is way too low]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — In the Line of Fire</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>agswain1987</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 23, 2011 11:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This is one of the best movies ever made in my opinion, I gave it a 10</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/215156/7-2-is-way-too-low</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 04:30:16 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/215156.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:10:58 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 7.2 is way too low on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Melton1</strong> — <em>2 months ago(January 27, 2026 01:13 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It’s a superb thriller that deserves at least an 8.5<br />
Clint vs Malkovich is a dynamite pairing <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f4a5.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--boom" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":boom:" alt="💥" /></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806694</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806694</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 7.2 is way too low on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>thomaswilliamboner</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 08, 2015 06:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Watching it now, it's been about 10 years. It is a really good movie, should be rated higher. It has also aged well, unlike a lot of movies from The 90's. Clint Eastwood is wonderful in it, so is John Malkovich.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806693</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806693</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 7.2 is way too low on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>GreenGoblinsOckVenom86</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 04, 2014 02:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree.  I'd give it an 8 though.   I'd like to buy it on bluray but haven't yet.    I really can't say it's as good as Schindler's List which came out the same year.<br />
When the Story Lady tells us about the naughty boy who blew up his goldfish.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806692</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806692</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 7.2 is way too low on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>frankzappayay</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 30, 2014 12:46 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It is a decent film but it has so many ridiculous moments, some really bad dialogue, and too much cheese.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806691</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806691</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 7.2 is way too low on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>vicky_lc2001</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 13, 2014 07:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think 7.2 is too low as well, I have it an 8/10.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806690</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806690</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 7.2 is way too low on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>JoeSchmoe007</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 15, 2015 06:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree that the movie is underrated but the best of Wolfgang Petersen's movies is easily Das Boot.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806689</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806689</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 7.2 is way too low on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>parker2010</strong> — <em>14 years ago(May 22, 2011 03:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I too would give this one at least a 9I still pull this one out of my DVD collection every once in a whilegreat movie</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806688</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806688</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 7.2 is way too low on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>coys77</strong> — <em>14 years ago(April 29, 2011 04:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah 7.2 is ridiculous. I gave it a 9..</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806687</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806687</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 7.2 is way too low on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Zach126</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 24, 2011 11:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree.  7.2 is indeed way too low for this fine action thriller. It's one of Eastwood's very best films &amp; probably the best film Wolfgang Peterson ever helmed.  I would give it at least a 9 or 9.5 myself.<br />
"Flying thru hyperspace ain't like dusting crops boy!"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806686</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806686</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:11:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 7.2 is way too low on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:10:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806685</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806685</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:10:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>