<![CDATA[On TV in Japan they showed a version edited for time that completely cut out the romance. Which also meant they cut most]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — In the Line of Fire

saimin2 — 10 years ago(September 04, 2015 05:46 PM)

On TV in Japan they showed a version edited for time that completely cut out the romance. Which also meant they cut most of the scenes where it's just Rene Russo and Clint Eastwood talking. It may sound odd, but I think the no romance version makes more sense and is a lot tighter.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/215182/on-tv-in-japan-they-showed-a-version-edited-for-time-that-completely-cut-out-the-romance-which-also-meant-they-cut-mostRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 10:33:16 GMTFri, 01 May 2026 20:15:53 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to On TV in Japan they showed a version edited for time that completely cut out the romance. Which also meant they cut most on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:15:55 GMT]]>WaySheGoes — 9 years ago(April 14, 2016 02:42 PM)

That sounds a lot better. Just saw it for the first time wished they would have cut that useless plot

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806957https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806957Fri, 01 May 2026 20:15:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to On TV in Japan they showed a version edited for time that completely cut out the romance. Which also meant they cut most on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:15:54 GMT]]>amkus — 10 years ago(December 16, 2015 04:07 AM)

I hated the romance. Seemed really shoe horned in. There were a couple cliches that I saw coming a mile away that distracted from an otherwise excellent movie.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806956https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1806956Fri, 01 May 2026 20:15:54 GMT