<![CDATA[Just spotted this…]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — In the Name of the Father

mikeyg24 — 15 years ago(May 30, 2010 04:44 PM)

Inspector Dixon claims on the stand that he '
never even spoke to Mr Conlon
' yet when Gerry is on the stand the prosecution clearly state '
Do you remember telling the police anything else about that night? Let me refresh your memory. You told lnspector Dixon that you had committed a robbery on that night
' if he never spoke to Dixon how could the prosecution use evidence prooving he did?
Good guys may not finish last but they sure as sh*t don't finish first!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/215256/just-spotted-thisRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 15:17:29 GMTFri, 01 May 2026 20:27:01 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Just spotted this… on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:27:03 GMT]]>Milkdoesabodygood — 9 years ago(June 28, 2016 05:54 AM)

It was dreadful to say the least.
Spoiler alert for them spoil sports out there! Y'all like spoiled milk, stop crying over it!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1807554https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1807554Fri, 01 May 2026 20:27:03 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Just spotted this… on Fri, 01 May 2026 20:27:02 GMT]]>roberto-72 — 15 years ago(August 07, 2010 08:44 AM)

Yeah, noticed that as well. But since all aspects of the handling of the original case were dreadful, the fact that this got by should hardly be a surprise.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1807553https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1807553Fri, 01 May 2026 20:27:02 GMT