you're crazy because I would forever have that feeling in my mind whenever we would make love that she was with another dude after me. I know this world is beep up and people have absolutely no morals or values anymore. But, there is absolutely no way that I would even consider this.

I truly believe that all of the people above who said, "No way!!" would be whistling a different tune if they were actually offered $1 million dollars to do the same thing. C'mon! It's one night! It's not like she's 12 and giving up her virginity or something..she's probably been around the block a few times and this ONE NIGHT will provide her and her husband with financial security. Few (if any) people would turn that down.

If it was for my sick child, I'll do itif that makes me a whore, so be it!I think you're always amother first

i would blow robert redford right NOW for a million.

This message has been deleted.

Hey, I am not married and I never wanna but last time I checked; it said 'For richer or for poor' right so that means stick together if they are rich or poor right? Well Hell no I wouldn't gamble like that with my marriage like that (if I was married), No I would tell the millionair to take his money and shove it. I don't care if my man and I live on the streets or in a car; we started with love, we live on love and we may as well die with love.
Obviously David was the only wise character in the story because John still thinks he can buy people even love, Diana should have told John to stay the Hell away from her.

Well, a million isn't what it use to be, but maybe for 2 million.

love never lasts but the money can buy more love

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

No Beautiful Noise i m not agree with u & one in world should a honoured person will let his Child die rather to send her wife for such a beep job it doesn't make sense & no problem in this world have this solution.. totaly Distractingggggggggggggg.

I agree nicolelovesashton

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

Actually, the definition of prostitution is two-fold. It is the act of OFFERING to have sex for money, or it is the act of corrupting something. Ignoring the first definition, which really depends on who initiates, I would have to say that having sex to save a child is not corrupting and thus not prostitution while sex for money is corrupting and thus prostitution.
And to reply to an earlier thread, a single act of sex for money does not make one a whore. The definition of a whore is 'one who engages in sexual acts for money' thus a person is not a whore for having sex for money once, but for continuously engaging in having sex for money. A whore can undo the title by forgoing sex for money.
Source: Webster's Dictionary
(And no, I would not have my wife have sex with another man for money. It does not matter how much.)

Ok sorrywhat I meant to say was both ways are prostitution, one is just more obliging.

This message has been deleted.

Hell Yes.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

So the 'real' question is how much money are you willing to prostitute yourself to make yourself feel good about being a whore?
marry a guy with money.:))
it feels good.

I agree with you organised_chaos_

who cares get the money then move out of town