<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[How in the hell is this a 5.8?!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Wayne's World 2</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>radioanagrama</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 29, 2011 08:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">seeing ratings like that remind me that sometimes IMDB users are way way way off base.<br />
movie is hilarious, as funny as the original IMO, sure it's a slapsticky comedy but it's also F*$CKING HILARIOUS.<br />
this should have at least an 8.0 rating</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/216345/how-in-the-hell-is-this-a-5-8</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:15:13 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/216345.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sillyspaghetti</strong> — <em>10 years ago(November 17, 2015 01:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I gave both the films an 8. Both so funny. Favourite scenes in this one are the scene with Handsome Dan and the scene where Wayne and Mr Wong do kung fu!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816730</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816730</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rwburnham</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 01, 2015 09:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This site is full of off-base ratings. A lot of great movies clearly are just not being appreciated by the majority of IMDB's user base.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816729</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816729</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MadSimian</strong> — <em>11 years ago(November 08, 2014 10:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">As of the time of this post, it's at 6.1 so you're slowly getting your wish. ;D<br />
The future belongs to those of us still willing to get our hands dirty. SaschaKonietzko</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816728</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816728</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>agenericperson</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 14, 2014 05:19 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i think this is just as funny as the original. but to be fair, i think neither one was that funny. they both had a few really funny bits but the rest of the films were mostly dull. i think the novelty of watching a movie about Wayne's World wore off on audiences after the first one. but that's just a guess. my only complaint i have for this one over the first one is they recycle some of the same gags, but all in all i thought they were about equal.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816727</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816727</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>scabab</strong> — <em>12 years ago(September 30, 2013 09:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Meh I gave it a 5.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816726</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816726</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mcharis-1</strong> — <em>12 years ago(May 13, 2013 07:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree as well.<br />
I was very surprised!<br />
I found both very fanny, but the second one i laugh my heart out with the scene with Garth &amp; Kim Basinger.<br />
I found the rating weird because personally me, I don't usually like those type of movies with the college kids who makes those stupid jokes about girls &amp; sex, &amp; all that stuff &amp; you see everywhere boobs coming out, lol, &amp; i am a feminist, I am very "serious" with stuff like that, but when I see a comedy to lighten up a little bit  with good &amp; silly jokes, I accept it &amp; I go along with the mood<br />
I think it a great comedy that deserved more than a 7.5</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816725</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816725</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FridayOnElmStreet</strong> — <em>12 years ago(May 06, 2013 07:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The rating really is too low.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816724</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816724</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>slugnutty</strong> — <em>12 years ago(April 06, 2013 11:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree the rating is low. I love the Graduate satire, but maybe the younger crowd doesn't get it. The movie had a lot of charm.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816723</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816723</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>reynardtfox</strong> — <em>13 years ago(October 10, 2012 10:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Most IMDBers are kids who didn't grow up with something, so are seeing it and judging it out of context, and are biased toward the stuff they grew up with/are aware of.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816722</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816722</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Kanoobi</strong> — <em>13 years ago(May 03, 2012 05:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I just came on here to add a quick comment. I hadn't seen either of the 2 movies for quite a while and after seeing a clip from Waynes World 2 of the Kenny G and dentist scene on YouTube I decided to watch the first movie again and loved every second of it. I felt it had aged well and the talk-to-the-camera routine was still very funny and appealing. Even the Laverne &amp; Shirley Parody was still funny, and that show was derived 2 decades before Wayne's World came out. It's a fantastic classic comedy film that deserves a much higher rating, as does the sequel.<br />
I thoroughly enjoyed revisiting Wayne's World and I am now going to watch Waynes World 2. Excellent! <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /><br />
5.8?! Ch'yea! As if! Party on film lovers!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816721</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816721</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>thorabart</strong> — <em>14 years ago(January 27, 2012 09:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This is in my opinion one of the funniest movies of all time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816720</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816720</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>HowYaLikeDemApplesWill</strong> — <em>14 years ago(November 12, 2011 06:54 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Breakin' 2, Electric Boogaloo, also does not get the love it deserves.<br />
The way Turbo, Special K and Ozone banded together to stop the evil white developer from bulldozing the community center by breakdancing in front of the bulldozercinematic magic!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816719</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816719</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>csweetleaf2</strong> — <em>14 years ago(November 09, 2011 02:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't know but I think this movie deserves at least a 7.0 rating, another movie I think is highly underrated on IMDB is Home Alone 2</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816718</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816718</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fleurfairy</strong> — <em>14 years ago(October 09, 2011 10:58 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I actually think this is one of the few sequels ever made that's better than the first movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816717</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816717</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sagat4</strong> — <em>14 years ago(October 04, 2011 08:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">As with most sequels, it wasn't as great as the first.Some of the gags were pointless - T Rex Ala Jurassic park? and the half naked Indian guy - funny the first time but got tiring after a while</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816716</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816716</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>neo-environmentalist</strong> — <em>14 years ago(July 23, 2011 08:34 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Noticed this just now, re-watched it recently, seriously tough critics. Deserves something in the 7 region, or 8 if you are a fan. I'd rate it 8.3<br />
Home: <a href="http://viewknowdo.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://viewknowdo.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816715</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816715</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816714</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816714</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Mashui</strong> — <em>14 years ago(June 24, 2011 12:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That's what i was gonna say and the original had a 6.9. They should be at least in the 7's. I guess to many preps watched this or something.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816713</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816713</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nwa75</strong> — <em>14 years ago(June 22, 2011 01:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was also shocked by the 5.8 rating. It was always my perception most people thought the 1st one was better, but still liked the 2nd one.  Personally, I think this is one of the rare comedy sequels which equals the original.  Off the top of my head, the only other three comedy sequels which equal the original in my opinion are Austin Powers 2, Clerks 2, and Christmas Vacation.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816712</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816712</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>blitzhard56</strong> — <em>14 years ago(June 02, 2011 09:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Totally agree.  I saw it again this morning and there are so many laughs in it. (And Walken was great in it too, I thought.)  Hell I think it blows 'The Hangover' and other modern comedy movie crap out of the water, but I guess that's just me.<br />
I don't get the 5.9.  Ridiculous.  More toward the 7.5 or 8 end in my opinion.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816711</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816711</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SamGGD</strong> — <em>14 years ago(April 27, 2011 10:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree it should be higher than 5.8, but THAT is what you find shocking? I'm more shocked that the first Wayne's World is only 6.9!!! That's a disgrace. The first is absolute class, f-cking hilarious. The 2nd isn't as good, still hilarious though!<br />
If you're gonna spew spew into this.<br />
I'm starting with the man in the mirror.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816710</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816710</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to How in the hell is this a 5.8?! on Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>eatmyboomstick</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 29, 2011 02:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I came on and was just about to write the same thing. I couldn't believe it, there are a ton of much, much less funny films than this that have ratings in the 6.0's.<br />
They both should be in the 7's. I've never met anyone that didn't like them.<br />
This is glue. Strong stuff. - Elwood Blues</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816709</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1816709</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 23:14:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>