<![CDATA[5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a go]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Beverly Hills Cop III

jhtg — 11 years ago(October 31, 2014 03:29 AM)

5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a good for it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/216686/5-4-is-too-low-sure-its-not-as-good-as-1-and-2-but-the-plots-ok-the-action-scenes-are-really-good-i-say-it-6-6-is-a-goRSS for NodeSun, 17 May 2026 16:09:17 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 00:22:22 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a go on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:32 GMT]]>sunyboy1 — 9 years ago(September 16, 2016 11:03 PM)

The setting is one of the most unique in all movies I have seen. This one is just pure fun and does not take its self too seriously. I will watch this anyway over the the 2nd movie, especially.
Herbert West: Who's going to believe a talking head? Get a job in a sideshow.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820447https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820447Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a go on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:31 GMT]]>dogsoldier_spoon-1 — 9 years ago(July 03, 2016 05:05 AM)

I'm surprised there's such a huge difference in opinion over the movies. I watched them all for the first time this week and I thought they were all good. Not great, but good. I don't see what makes the 3rd one so much worse. Yeah, I missed Taggart but I thought the setting was pretty cool.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820446https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820446Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a go on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:30 GMT]]>Fawkes_Rocks — 10 years ago(July 05, 2015 10:27 PM)

No. This move deserves a lower rating. It tries to hard to be funny and the new"replacement" characters aren't needed.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820445https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820445Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a go on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:29 GMT]]>!!!deleted!!! (56207245) — 10 years ago(January 25, 2016 10:26 AM)

I'm so sorry if I offended you by stating that I enjoy this movie. It's just an opinion. BTW I have watched the other 2 since they were ok. Funny, but not anymore than the 3rd. (To me)

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820444https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820444Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a go on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:28 GMT]]>HowYaLikeDemApplesWill — 10 years ago(January 23, 2016 05:53 PM)

Yep, that's the problemit was easy to follow, and just enough comedy.for a child.
Pretty stunning that after all these years you've seen this turd multiple times and never the original, which
was
comedy and action GOLD.
Whose idea was it for the word "Lisp" to have an "S" in it?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820443https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820443Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a go on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:26 GMT]]>!!!deleted!!! (56207245) — 11 years ago(December 28, 2014 09:24 AM)

apparently there's a lot of hate for this film. I personally, have always enjoyed this film ever since I was a child. It was easy to follow, with just enough action and just enough comedy to keep me entertained. I still enjoy this movie as an adult and I have yet to see beverly hills cop 1 & 2.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820442https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820442Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a go on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:25 GMT]]>koffeenkreame41-1 — 9 years ago(July 07, 2016 05:48 AM)

CLOSER TO a 7 TO 8 imho
This.
"I'm the ultimate badass,you do NOT wanna f-ck wit me!"Hudson,Aliens

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820441https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820441Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a go on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:24 GMT]]>koffeenkreame41-1 — 9 years ago(July 07, 2016 05:39 AM)

CLOSER TO a 7 TO 8 imho
This.
"I'm the ultimate badass,you do NOT wanna f-ck wit me!"Hudson,Aliens

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820440https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820440Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 5.4 is too low. sure its not as good as 1 and 2 but the plots ok the action scenes are really good. I say it 6.6 is a go on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:23 GMT]]>plwblj — 11 years ago(November 20, 2014 05:19 PM)

CLOSER TO a 7 TO 8 imho

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820439https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820439Sat, 02 May 2026 00:22:23 GMT