<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[4.7! surely some mistake]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Beverly Hills Cop III</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>moviefiend-1</strong> — <em>19 years ago(August 02, 2006 02:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">how the hell can this movie have 4.7!?!? surely one of the most out-right entertaining films ive ever seen.<br />
outrage!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/216695/4-7-surely-some-mistake</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:18:06 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/216695.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:31 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nginx</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 14, 2016 01:24 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This movie sucked. There's is no mistake. This is coming from someone who loved the first two.<br />
He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither ~ B. Franklin</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820539</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820539</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>protoman25</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 16, 2015 10:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Up to 5.5 now. You were on to something.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820538</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820538</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jajceboy</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 13, 2014 04:53 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought it was O.K but nothing more. As an action-comedy it was kind off disappointment since it wasn't remotely funny but other than that it was solid entertainment.<br />
But I wouldn't watch it more than once. This is the kind of film you watch late at night when there's nothing else on.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820537</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820537</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dasterly2007</strong> — <em>12 years ago(May 26, 2013 01:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I wouldn't even give it 0.<br />
A truly awful film,and worse then the 2nd,and that was bad enough.<br />
I wish they hadn't have made the 1st one now,then I wouldn't have had to sit through garbage like the 2nd and 3rd.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820536</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820536</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TheRapDude</strong> — <em>12 years ago(May 15, 2013 02:06 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree with the poster. This was a very good film, sure, it will never top the first two, but it's not nearly as bad as people are making it out to be.<br />
Fear not the darkness, but welcome its embrace.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820535</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820535</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BHt88</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 07, 2012 01:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I enjoyed it 8 for me<br />
part 1 is the best then 3 then 2<br />
BHT RISES <a href="http://myspace.com/blackheart60" rel="nofollow ugc">myspace.com/blackheart60</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820534</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820534</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Sawyer1625</strong> — <em>17 years ago(July 12, 2008 06:50 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I would say a 5 maybe 6 at the very most</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820533</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820533</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>beverhillscopcomingtoame</strong> — <em>17 years ago(June 23, 2008 04:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think that 4.9(the last time i saw the rating) is a mistake, i think that its at least a 6 rating. I would give it a 8-10, I actually liked itbut thats just me a fan of Eddie Murphy as well as the beverly hills cop movies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820532</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820532</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>heelmaster2000</strong> — <em>17 years ago(June 16, 2008 11:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought it was alright.  Not great by a long shot, not terrible, but I saw it once and will only see it once!  I agree that this was a paycheck movie and nothing more to be perfectly honest.  In truth I gave it a 6, but that was mainly out of pity.<br />
"Because he's John Doe by choice!"  Se7en</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820531</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820531</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bigombe</strong> — <em>17 years ago(June 02, 2008 11:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I watched BHC and BHC 2 100 times back in the eighties; this is not in the same league.<br />
It didn't even feel like a BHC movie with titty bar Axel Foley rescuing kids on a ferris wheel.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820530</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820530</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Michael_Essien</strong> — <em>18 years ago(February 18, 2008 02:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">some of it is really crap but i also loved it, i think the bad guy is good, i like uncle dave (though he never said much) and found this a generally entertaining sequel (better than 2 probably)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820529</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820529</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>atari_saturna</strong> — <em>18 years ago(January 03, 2008 06:22 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In my opinion BHC2 and BHC3 were far better movies than the first one!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820528</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820528</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>masschaos</strong> — <em>18 years ago(October 15, 2007 08:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This movie i felt was on par with BHC1, and it kicked 2's ass<br />
BHC1: The movie that started the trilogy, and probably the most sarcastic and honestly funny.<br />
BHC2: Darker sequel, I thought it was good, but nothing more than a lackluster sequel.<br />
BHC3: Whimsical, more flashy and farfetched than the first 2, but had the intelligence and wit that made the first so enjoyable, definitely not an 8, but easily a 6less than 5 is an insult!<br />
I'm no scientist, but those mice were a different color - Lieutinant Colonel Shepard</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820527</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820527</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>southernman100</strong> — <em>18 years ago(September 06, 2007 07:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This movie was good minus the Serge parts. How could anyone not like the last scene of the movie with Eddie Murphy killing all the people hiding around in the rides.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820526</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820526</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:24:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Guint45</strong> — <em>18 years ago(June 11, 2007 09:24 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">its cheesy as hell but still worthy of around a 7 for me</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820525</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820525</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>xenodrone</strong> — <em>18 years ago(April 29, 2007 05:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Same WTF this film is great Ive seen it serval times its good much better then 2 hell even 1. Ive showed friends this who also liked it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820524</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820524</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820523</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820523</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>truaxjohn</strong> — <em>19 years ago(February 28, 2007 04:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Did a little kid start this topic and tell us that this movie was entertaining?  I cannot believe this didn't go straight to video.  This is what people talk about when they say a big name gets a movie into 2,000 theatres although the movie is complete junk.  This is a paycheck movie and these studios should should carry some accountability for shoveling this junk.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820522</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820522</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>cny_cd</strong> — <em>19 years ago(February 26, 2007 12:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's just not that good of a movie, especially when you compare it to the first two.  If it was a standalone movie, I could see your point a little bit more, but this movie definately suffers by comparison.  I rated it a 5 and I think that's about right.  It's watchable, just not memorable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820521</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820521</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820520</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820520</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lakrfan2834</strong> — <em>19 years ago(February 18, 2007 06:19 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I recently viewed this movie, and although I did not find it to be an unbelievable movie, it was definitely wildly entertaining. Murphy revived his role as Axel Foley quiete brilliantly, and the story had some pizazz to it. Its not a flippin award winning film, but it was enjoyable. ur overreacting bro.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820519</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820519</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lepunkdigitale</strong> — <em>17 years ago(August 23, 2008 09:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I personally don't think anybody should be as snobby as to correct someone's grammar when they're simply discussing their reasons for liking a movie. Fair enough defend your side of the picture(with the acceptance that people are different and the common sense to realise that movie watching is a fairly relative affair of course) , but some people are dyslexic and may not be very good at spelling. We'd all do so much better in this world were it not for up turned noses getting in our way all the time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820518</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820518</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>harlemworldeva</strong> — <em>18 years ago(December 16, 2007 07:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Of course this ovie isn't some cinematic masterpiece it's a tremendous guilty pleasure! Just plain fun.<br />
I love this movie with all its goofs and stupidity. Judge Reinhold rocks and so does Eddie Murphy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820517</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820517</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 4.7! surely some mistake on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>andrewblunt85</strong> — <em>18 years ago(May 07, 2007 11:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">its great! i don't know why some people don't like it.<br />
the movie is closer to a 10 than a 5!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820516</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820516</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:23:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>