<![CDATA[This was a good–or great movie]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Beverly Hills Cop III

vicefan06 — 17 years ago(June 30, 2008 07:05 PM)

I disagree with all the haters out there, BHCIII was a good and entertaining movie. And they brought back the charachter of Serge, he was hilarious in the movie, and Eddie was Eddiehilarious. I loved this movie and can't wait for part 4.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/216703/this-was-a-good-or-great-movieRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 02:19:36 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 00:25:19 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:31 GMT]]>trainedwreck — 10 years ago(November 04, 2015 08:59 PM)

Bad or worst troll?
soundcloud.com/jackofallfunk

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820607https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820607Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:30 GMT]]>sillyspaghetti — 10 years ago(June 28, 2015 11:44 AM)

I think all 3 films are great. I find them all entertaining.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820606https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820606Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:29 GMT]]>thiago-sturiale-343-893179 — 11 years ago(May 05, 2014 01:15 PM)

Hey ppl, the part 4 is coming!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820605https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820605Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:28 GMT]]>Prismark10 — 14 years ago(January 28, 2012 12:41 PM)

It was good not great but better than Part 2.
Its that man again!!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820604https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820604Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:27 GMT]]>sagat4 — 14 years ago(December 19, 2011 07:21 AM)

It was the worse in the franchise. Nothing about been a hater or what. I just re-watched the trilogy on DVD and the extras. From what i can gather, many scripts where bounded around. I liked the idea of both Judge and John going to London to apprehend a guy in London only to get stuck and have Eddie bail them out. The opening scenes where good but it began to fall apart as it progressed and the whole wonder world thing was not necessary.
This is coming from an Eddie fan
My Voting history is secret;)

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820603https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820603Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:26 GMT]]>SteveResin — 15 years ago(September 04, 2010 05:21 PM)

Oh man it so wasn't
The memories of a man in his old age are the deeds of a man in his prime

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820602https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820602Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:25 GMT]]>BrickNash — 15 years ago(June 07, 2010 07:51 AM)

I totally agree, while it wasn't as in depth and well crafted as the first two (It'd be hard to top the second one!) I do think it was a polished, entertaining piece of action cinema.
There were some obvious flaws, like the absence of John Ashton and Ronnie Cox and murdering Gil Hils charcter Todd was a big mistake. His sporadic scenes were some of the best aned funniest in the series. I personally would like to have seen his character more involved rather than gunned down. I'm sure another motive for Axel returning to California could have been arranged.
But these flaws aside it's a film that I enjoy from time to time and is certainly better than the crap that pours out of Hollywood today!
Well, here's hoping Tony Scott and the whole cast return for BHCIV

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820601https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820601Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:24 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820600https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820600Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:23 GMT]]>Guardia — 15 years ago(May 22, 2010 08:09 AM)

Oh I get it! You're being very sarcastic.
Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820599https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820599Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:22 GMT]]>johanson17 — 16 years ago(January 29, 2010 06:33 PM)

You sir are delusional!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820598https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820598Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to This was a good–or great movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:21 GMT]]>vicefan06 — 16 years ago(July 03, 2009 11:51 AM)

Can they just make part 4 already?!!?!?!?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820597https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820597Sat, 02 May 2026 00:25:21 GMT