<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[They should have beefed up the romance subplot.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Beverly Hills Cop III</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>I_Guard_Tanelorn</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 15, 2014 03:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">One of the enjoyable aspects of the Lethal Weapon series was watching Riggs score and settle down with his woman.  I think watching Axel woo his love interest for 40 minutes would have given a big boost to this film, cause really, the stuff with the case isn't that interesting and it's a little repetitive.<br />
"I said no camels, that's five camels, can't you count?"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/216725/they-should-have-beefed-up-the-romance-subplot</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 13:09:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/216725.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:26:56 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to They should have beefed up the romance subplot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:26:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Anorensic</strong> — <em>11 years ago(July 31, 2014 12:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah hot chick in the tiny office skirt mmm..but Foley unfortunately looks gay most of the times through the movie until the point he finally asks her out and even that doesn't feel too convincing.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820687</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1820687</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:26:58 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>