<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Best Sequel]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Children of the Corn III: Urban Harvest</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ricky_may1</strong> — <em>15 years ago(February 03, 2011 07:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Urban Harvest is the best of the sequels better than part 2 Great Horror film as well!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/216902/best-sequel</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:48:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/216902.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Sequel on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822172</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822172</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Sequel on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822171</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822171</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Sequel on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>smitthhh</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 05, 2014 08:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Definitely better than part 2!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822170</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822170</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Sequel on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822169</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822169</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Sequel on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ElectricWarlock</strong> — <em>13 years ago(May 25, 2012 03:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree that it is a very good film. Eli is one of my favorite characters from any movie and Daniel Cerny did a great job at playing him. I don't think there is any actor who could've played the part any better.<br />
Come, fly the teeth of the wind. Share my wings.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822168</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822168</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Sequel on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sonickid</strong> — <em>14 years ago(November 12, 2011 05:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I have to disagree with the OP.<br />
CotC III isn't a bad movie, but I wouldn't say it's the best of the sequels (although it's a lot better than some of them).<br />
Imo, it's better than Part VIII: Genesis, much better than the remake, &amp; immensely better than Part VI (Part VI was the only movie in the CotC series that I felt was unwatchable).<br />
Also, while I liked the story in Part II better than III, the acting was so much better in Part III than II.<br />
My IMDb vote history:<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/user/ur5998197/ratings" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/user/ur5998197/ratings</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822167</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822167</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Sequel on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>RHPSvegas</strong> — <em>14 years ago(May 09, 2011 05:19 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I have to agree that it's the best of all of the COTC sequels, but I do agree that the monster at the end was ridiculous and poorly executed. It's lifting a freaking Barbie doll! I think up until the last 10 minutes it's a very good movie. I could do without the scarecrow coming alive parts, but I digress.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822166</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822166</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Best Sequel on Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Guardia</strong> — <em>14 years ago(April 10, 2011 02:35 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'll agree it's better than CotC2, but I still think it misses the point a bit. The big monster wasn't really needed was it? It was easily the least scariest thing in all the first 3 movies.<br />
Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822165</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1822165</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 00:53:16 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>