<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Meredith&#x27;s atorney]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Disclosure</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Moviemanic22</strong> — <em>10 years ago(April 01, 2016 11:56 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Does anybody feel that he came across as a bit of a uptight douche? It's almost as if he knew he had to put up a act despite knowing the truth.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/217031/meredith-s-atorney</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:38:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/217031.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 01:11:14 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Meredith&#x27;s atorney on Sat, 02 May 2026 01:11:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Binkconn</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 07, 2016 12:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That's his job, whatever he knows about his client - to do his best to discredit the opposing party to the best of his ability, make the plantiff appear unreliable, unstable, etc. (though as the trivia notes at a mediation he wouldn't even be cross-examining anyone the way he does here; they would be just laying out terms of agreement).</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1823150</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1823150</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 01:11:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>