<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Cheap look to the movie]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Timecop</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>SeasonalAffective</strong> — <em>12 years ago(October 11, 2013 01:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">From the opening credits font, to the obvious Vancouver stand-in for whatever big city this was supposed to take place in, to the cheap props (all the guns used, like in the opening sequence, or in the Wall Street sequence, and the pistols the TEC cops use)  there's just a very cheap look to the film.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/218191/cheap-look-to-the-movie</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 16:15:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/218191.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 04:27:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cheap look to the movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 04:27:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BB-15</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 16, 2016 08:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, the design of things in the future looked cheap.<br />
The future cars looked ugly.<br />
The time machine sled was pretty horrible looking.<br />
The future gun design was pathetic.<br />
That along with plenty of predictable dialogue/plot, major time travel inconsistencies and Van Damme's weak acting = a pretty poor film.<br />
But it was sort of entertaining in a so bad it was good way for some of it.<br />
4/10 imo<br />
BB <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f609.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--wink" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=";-)" alt="😉" /><br />
it is just in my opinion - imo -</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1833583</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1833583</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 04:27:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cheap look to the movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 04:27:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sage2112</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 21, 2015 11:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah I kinda like the look, though.  Perhaps I'm just easily entertained.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1833582</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1833582</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 04:27:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Cheap look to the movie on Sat, 02 May 2026 04:27:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TVippy</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 11, 2013 11:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The laser sights were drawn right on the film itself.<br />
I own you.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1833581</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1833581</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 04:27:34 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>