<![CDATA[but as soon as a military guy started talking on and on and on about how serious the consequences would be if no timecop]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Timecop

JohnM_99 — 12 years ago(February 11, 2014 07:24 PM)

but as soon as a military guy started talking on and on and on about how serious the consequences would be if no timecop, I got turned off (and off the movie). I don't need to hear your stupid-a** lecture about the situations that make ZERO sense anyway. Just throw me some ACTIONS!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/218248/but-as-soon-as-a-military-guy-started-talking-on-and-on-and-on-about-how-serious-the-consequences-would-be-if-no-timecopRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 19:38:47 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 04:36:07 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to but as soon as a military guy started talking on and on and on about how serious the consequences would be if no timecop on Sat, 02 May 2026 04:36:10 GMT]]>lineageya — 11 years ago(October 19, 2014 06:18 PM)

It's easy to judge a movie 20 years later. This movie was pretty good back in its day compared to the other movies out around 94. Except for those futuristic limousines what the hell were they thinking.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1834049https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1834049Sat, 02 May 2026 04:36:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to but as soon as a military guy started talking on and on and on about how serious the consequences would be if no timecop on Sat, 02 May 2026 04:36:09 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1834048https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1834048Sat, 02 May 2026 04:36:09 GMT