<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Politics</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Penelope</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 04:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious mention that precluded other religions - favoring one religion over another?<br />
A high school valedictorian's speech is allegedly being censored and facing pushback for being "very Christianized," according to a letter sent Tuesday.<br />
Savannah Lefler, a senior at John Glenn High School in Michigan, recently submitted a draft for an "Honors Night" speech, which contained language criticizing other philosophies and asserting "[t]he purpose of life is to live a life devoted to Christ."<br />
The school's principal responded, in part, by suggesting Lefler's speech wasn't inclusive enough of other faiths.<br />
"We have a diverse student body and staff. It is one of the things I love about the John Glenn community," said principal Michael Wegher at the end of last month.<br />
"That diversity goes well beyond race and ethnicity, it certainly would include religious beliefs as well. We have students and staff who would identify as Jewish, Muslim, Buddhist, Hindi, Sikh, Jehovah's Witness, atheist, etc. We must be inclusive and respectful of their beliefs as well," Wegher said.<br />
"With this said, we do need to see a revision that sticks to a non-secular [sic] approach. I am not opposed to thanking God for the great honor bestowed upon you, but we cannot take the approach that is currently laid out in your speech."<br />
The letter to the principal, sent by First Liberty on Tuesday, alleges that Lefler asked for additional clarification during a phone call.<br />
"You … stated that the second part of the speech, which references Plato, Darwin and other religions, was acceptable because it discusses different philosophies," First Liberty attorneys told Wegher in the letter.<br />
"The problem, you explained, was the next portion of the speech in which Ms. Lefler explains her personal belief that the purpose of life is to live a life devoted to Christ. You explained that this portion was ‘very Christianized’ and needed to be changed in order to not offend people with other viewpoints."<br />
Wegher did not respond to Fox News' request for comment. In a lengthy statement last week, Wayne-Westland Community Schools didn't address accusations of censorship.<br />
Instead, it offered a more general description of the ceremony: "Traditionally, student speakers are selected as part of the festivities and celebration. Every student that has the honor of speaking at this ceremony has demonstrated a deep commitment to their educational success and we celebrate their accomplishments with them."<br />
"When students are thrust onto the stage of an honors celebration, we recognize that we have an academic responsibility to walk with them in that process. Public speaking at an event of this magnitude is similar to playing in a championship game. It is a difficult challenge. When students play a sport, coaches are there to walk with them to help them engage and succeed at the highest level. When students speak at these events, our school leadership is there to walk alongside and coach them to success."<br />
Tuesday's letter was the second within a week in which First Liberty demanded a Michigan high school refrain from censoring religious speech.<br />
Last week, Hillsdale High School reversed its decision to censor a valedictorian's speech that mentioned Jesus Christ.<br />
In both instances, First Liberty argued that the school mistakenly interpreted student speeches as communicating on behalf of the school. U.S. Department of Education guidance, as the firm notes, says that graduation speeches are considered private and constitutionally protected.<br />
In his email, Wegher had told Lefler: "I appreciate your desire to speak from the heart and share your beliefs and philosophies with others. Unfortunately, we are a public educational institution and must legally abide by the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution. Through past Supreme Court cases, rulings have stated that government institutions, including public schools, cannot favor one religion over any others. This would include honors speeches since it would be an official communication from the school."<br />
According to First Liberty's letter, Wegher set up a time to meet with the school's legal advisers on June 2 – the same day as Lefler's speech.<br />
"Too often, we have seen well-meaning school officials thinking they are complying with the Establishment Clause mistakenly go too far and censor the private speech of students, violating students’ rights under the Free Speech Clause," said First Liberty general counsel Mike Berry and senior counsel Stephanie Taub.<br />
"We request that you allow Ms. Lefler to express her private religious beliefs in her Honors Night speech."<br />
A representative for Wayne-Westland Community Schools did not immediately respond to Fox News' inquiry about First Liberty's letter.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/21841/thoughts-did-they-violate-her-first-amendment-rights-or-did-the-school-act-responsibly-by-prohibiting-religious-menti</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 19:10:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/21841.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rouge</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 09:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Lol humanity always loves to do things in extreme<br />
come here</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230447</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230447</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MissMargoChanning</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 09:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">We live in the age of "inclusiveness"? " inclusion"?? whatever???<br />
We Must Not Offend Anyone!<br />
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.<br />
Fasten Your Seatbelts….<br />
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230446</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230446</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rouge</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 08:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I definitely learned something new. I wonder how many schools know that speeches are protected speech regardless of the content? That’s definitely not been my experience but I also didn’t have enough legal knowledge to question it at the time.<br />
Yay informative debates<br />
come here</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230445</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230445</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Penelope</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 03, 2021 02:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Maybe, like toddlers, eventually they'll run out of steam?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230444</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230444</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230443</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230443</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Penelope</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 09:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">What are you currently watching?<br />
It's inclusive.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230442</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230442</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MissMargoChanning</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 09:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Excuse me. I certainly didn't mean to offend with my Over The Years thread.<br />
[slinks away]<br />
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.<br />
Fasten Your Seatbelts….<br />
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230441</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230441</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Penelope</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 08:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Getting so tired of tits and "express my sexuality" threads.<br />
Or the ever-mind-numbing "What are you listening to" thread.  How much brain power does that take?<br />
Oh . . . wait.  Brain power.  Yeah.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230440</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230440</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MissMargoChanning</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 08:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">psssssstttt… Just between you, me, and everyone else here, I like it too.<br />
Sure beats instructions on how to jerk off.<br />
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.<br />
Fasten Your Seatbelts….<br />
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230439</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230439</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MagneticMonopole</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 07:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It also helps when the person who posted the OP does research to help clarify things as the conversation goes on. I appreciated that.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230438</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230438</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Penelope</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 07:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It keeps conversation going and makes people think.  I like it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230437</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230437</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MissMargoChanning</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 07:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Pinky! Pleeeeze!<br />
I don't think I can take another controversial subject.<br />
I'm still recovering after the last one!<br />
I will toss in my 2 cents worth though.<br />
You can't please everyone, but these days, you are considered a louse for not trying.<br />
OK. Please continue…<br />
You asked a pretty question; I've given you the ugly answer.<br />
Fasten Your Seatbelts….<br />
It's Going To Be A Bumpy Night!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230436</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230436</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jan_El_Senor</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 07:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Issue solved. Nothing to see here.<br />
Grade "A" Fully Loaded<br />
"Sexy as Hell"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230435</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230435</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230434</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230434</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rouge</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 03, 2021 02:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">An honours speech isn't about lecturing to the audience and telling them they're all wrong in their belief systems. How did she ever graduate? (That's a real, genuine question by the way. I sincerely am curious how she made it that far, much less valedictorian).<br />
I think we’re all secretly asking ourselves this question. Valedictorians are typically well-rounded, socially adept, and demonstrate great maturity. Her speech lacks all of that. I wonder if this just happens to be a really rural school with not much diversity in thinking?<br />
Her entire speech is faith-based, and not education-based. I get it, it's a no win situation regardless, but I've never been in any academic situation where anything of this sort would have been allowed.<br />
Same, that’s why it’s so shocking to me. I imagine if someone else of a different faith was selected as valedictorian and spoke about everyone needing to accept THEIR deity or else suffer eternal damnation, she’d be the first to make a stink about it<br />
come here</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230433</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230433</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230432</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230432</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jan_El_Senor</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 08:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's a bad speech even considered in the context of evangelizing. The only people who will praise that speech are other Christians (and most of them won't). That speech will only serve to turn off non-believers and give them a greater disdain for religion.<br />
It's like those ****ty "Christian" movies like<br />
God's Not Dead<br />
. Non-Christians can't stomach them, and even believing Christians know deep down that the movies suck.<br />
Grade "A" Fully Loaded<br />
"Sexy as Hell"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230431</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230431</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rouge</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 08:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Lol definitely the former, unless she’s planning to go to Liberty University.<br />
come here</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230430</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230430</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Penelope</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 07:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">First Amendment rights - you can say what you want; but beware of the consequences!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230429</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230429</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Cerridwen</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 06:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">She'll either get roasted for her speech after being allowed to give it, or will be vindicated and martyred by the Christian right if denied. Which is the more fun option?<br />
Cynicism aside, it really is a garbage speech, whether or not she should be allowed to give it.<br />
Hark! Harold the angel sings.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230428</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230428</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rouge</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 06:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Because of it, some innocent college campus may be spared one sign-wielding, demon-denouncing warrior of God in the future.<br />
Hahaha I sent pinky’s article to my husband and he basically had the same response as you: “poor baby, wait until she gets a real position in the real world.”<br />
come here</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230427</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230427</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Penelope</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 07:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Another case they represented for the same thing was deemed valid.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230426</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230426</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MagneticMonopole</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 07:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Right, that's what HER lawyers say–and they may very well be right, but they could also be full of crap. There have been similar cases before where proselytizing speech at a public school was ruled unconstitutional. I just don't remember what the specific rules are.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230425</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230425</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Thoughts?  Did they violate her first amendment rights, or did the school act responsibly by prohibiting religious menti on Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Penelope</strong> — <em>4 years ago(June 02, 2021 07:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's a public school, and the law firm representing her:  " . . . the school mistakenly interpreted student speeches as communicating on behalf of the school. U.S. Department of Education guidance, as the firm notes, says that graduation speeches are considered private and constitutionally protected."<br />
So, it appears she does have a right to make the speech, and the school can publish a disclaimer stating it's her views, and does not represent that of the school.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230424</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/230424</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:27:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>