<![CDATA[I wonder why they didn't just reimburse Artie Piscano for his expenses]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Casino

Stevicus-2 — 9 years ago(November 03, 2016 05:58 AM)

That seemed to be the major sorepoint for Artie Piscano, that he was spending his own money to go out to Vegas to keep an eye on things. That's what he kept complaining about and it's why he started keeping records which would later be used as evidence of Mob involvement in the skim.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/219074/i-wonder-why-they-didn-t-just-reimburse-artie-piscano-for-his-expensesRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 12:51:02 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 06:25:24 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I wonder why they didn't just reimburse Artie Piscano for his expenses on Sat, 02 May 2026 06:25:26 GMT]]>hugogonz-1 — 9 years ago(January 09, 2017 06:17 PM)

This guy can even F up a cup of coffee, how he became a boss is beyond me.
BOB SAGEEETTTTT!!!!! - Tourettes Guy

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1839944https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1839944Sat, 02 May 2026 06:25:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I wonder why they didn't just reimburse Artie Piscano for his expenses on Sat, 02 May 2026 06:25:25 GMT]]>cabal24 — 9 years ago(November 08, 2016 08:32 AM)

Thats not why he kept records. This character is mostly Carl Deluna. Deluna always kept records. It was his personality. Which lead to a connect the dots for the FBI to crack down in the 80s.
But yes I agree, pay the man! Not how Nick Civella thought about things.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1839943https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1839943Sat, 02 May 2026 06:25:25 GMT