<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Underrated]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Get Shorty</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jsagotsky-1</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 06, 2016 11:58 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought this was a very funny movie.  Clever, well cast and well acted.  It is an not too subtle spoof of the movie industry,<br />
So why is it rated so low?  Is the humor too subtle?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/219395/underrated</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:42:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/219395.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:07:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sat, 02 May 2026 07:07:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>LorqVonRay1999</strong> — <em>1 year ago(March 31, 2025 04:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I have always felt this is one of the very best movies of the 90s, an easy 10/10.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1842173</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1842173</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:07:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sat, 02 May 2026 07:07:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mrkovacs</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 22, 2016 06:50 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Get Shorty really is in a class by itself. It's pretty much a perfect film.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1842172</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1842172</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:07:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sat, 02 May 2026 07:07:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1842171</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1842171</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:07:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Underrated on Sat, 02 May 2026 07:07:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>seabeam</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 16, 2016 12:13 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, I totally agree. Everything comes together perfectly with this movie and if you asked me to name any faults I don't know I could come up with any. Just the fact it's one of the few movies I can watch again anytime tells me it's exceptional.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1842170</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1842170</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 07:07:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>