<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[sort-of hitchcockian - lot of suspense + turns]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Nick of Time</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>LTUM</strong> — <em>13 years ago(June 30, 2012 05:35 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">dude i forgot all about this movie. i can't remember when i saw it but i know it was well over ten years ago. maybe even in the 90s. turned on the TV today and BAM there it was again. i don't know why this one slipped my mind; it has a lot of suspense, turns and twists.<br />
i say it has a lot of hitchcock in the film. keeps you wondering every single minute what will happen next.<br />
just now found out from reading the boards here that this was the inspiration for 24. .never heard that.<br />
but in any case, i like this film. i recommend it. not sure why all the hate and criticism on this board. my only criticism is using marsha mason, b/c i can't stand her for some reason. dunno why. i can think of a dozen other 50ish milfs they coulda used instead of her. she just creeps me out for some reason</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/219976/sort-of-hitchcockian-lot-of-suspense-turns</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 14:06:13 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/219976.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:26 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to sort-of hitchcockian - lot of suspense + turns on Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DracTarashV</strong> — <em>13 years ago(December 24, 2012 01:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I didn't notice the Hitchcock influence until probably my third viewing<br />
What Are<br />
You Looking<br />
At Dicknose</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1846026</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1846026</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to sort-of hitchcockian - lot of suspense + turns on Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MonteCarloMan</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 24, 2012 01:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agreed! Way to pick up on that..Badham made effective use of clock closeups, lights &amp; shadows that it did take on that Hitchcockian effect now that you mention it. Never heard that connected to this movie before but totally agree w/you.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1846025</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1846025</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:27 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>