<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Questionable Plot  **Spoiler**]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Nick of Time</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>gtrz</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 19, 2011 02:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If so much of the security detail was in on the plot to kill the governor, why wouldn't one of them do it?<br />
And if they wanted an outsider, a gun-for-hire wouldn't have been hard to find.<br />
Why involve an innocent man and his daughter?<br />
The premise of the film from the start is a bit absurd.<br />
I understand that Walken's character is psychoticbut the other conspirators would sense this about him also. So it is unlikely that they would go along with such a convoluted plan to recruit an assassin.  Remember, Walken was not the one with ultimate authority, "Mystery Man" was (the one who got away at the end).<br />
As for the suspense factor, I didn't know about the governor butc'mon, how many of you watched this and thought that they might really kill his daughter???  It was obvious that she would be rescued - heck, the movie is even called NICK OF TIME  so much for suspense.<br />
Sure, it is just a moviebut I like to watch a thriller that presents itself in such a way as to feel that what is happening on the screen could actually happen in real life.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/219980/questionable-plot-spoiler</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 18:48:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/219980.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:44 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Questionable Plot  **Spoiler** on Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jevicci</strong> — <em>14 years ago(October 31, 2011 06:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was thinking the same thing when Walken and several of the security detail draw their weapons right as Depp is about to take the shot at the governor.  It makes sense in that, in case Depp messed it up or missed or whatever (it's not like he has any experience with guns as far as anyone knows), they could take her out and let Depp take the fall for it.  What I don't understand, though, is that a forensic investigation would likely reveal the multiple weapons potentially used.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1846043</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1846043</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Questionable Plot  **Spoiler** on Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mousalope</strong> — <em>14 years ago(August 04, 2011 11:03 PM)</em></p>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<p dir="auto">the security detail was in on the plot to kill the governor, why wouldn't one of them do it?<br />
It looked to me like that's what they were going to do.  Depp was a diversion to cover for the hitter who was in an overlooking room.  That's the man who shot at the governor but put the bullets instead into the security man's kevlar vest.  Depp then fired a couple rounds at the shooter.</p>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1846042</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1846042</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Questionable Plot  **Spoiler** on Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MovieAlien</strong> — <em>14 years ago(April 09, 2011 04:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If so much of the security detail was in on the plot to kill the governor, why wouldn't one of them do it?<br />
Hmmmm, I dunnomaybe because they would go to jail?<br />
And if they wanted an outsider, a gun-for-hire wouldn't have been hard to find.<br />
The governor's husband suggested that, but it would cost money and it could be traced back to the husband and his wife's security detail. On the other hand, a guy alleging "strange people in suits blackmailed me" would be a hard claim to prove. Especially since this same guy was caught on camera looking crazy and confused.<br />
Why involve an innocent man and his daughter?<br />
Because a caught off-guard innocent man would have more motivation if his daughter's life were at stake, compared to what $10,000 is to an experienced killer.<br />
I understand that Walken's character is psychoticbut the other conspirators would sense this about him also.<br />
Your point? Walken's character seemed to be a mercenary/ex-marine of some type, he was an expert at interrogation, defensive fighting skills and deliberate cruelty to get the results he wanted. The whole movie was more a battle of wits between Depp &amp; Walken's characters than a suspense film - Depp thinks he can find a way out and rescue his daughter, and Walken kept him in check and told him he had no place to go. There's not a single fistfight between both characters in which Depp's character was victorious - however, by the time he got out of Walken's sight (a strategy which WAS risky and suspenseful), he was one step ahead of the conspirators.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1846041</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1846041</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 08:18:45 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>