<![CDATA[What did it mean that both of them had tumors on their legs?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Total Eclipse

WickedFabala — 14 years ago(October 18, 2011 02:59 PM)

was it important?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220181/what-did-it-mean-that-both-of-them-had-tumors-on-their-legsRSS for NodeSun, 17 May 2026 03:14:32 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 08:45:17 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to What did it mean that both of them had tumors on their legs? on Sat, 02 May 2026 08:45:19 GMT]]>IcingOnTheCake — 12 years ago(March 14, 2014 09:19 PM)

It could be a nod to venereal disease, syphilis perhaps.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1847469https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1847469Sat, 02 May 2026 08:45:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to What did it mean that both of them had tumors on their legs? on Sat, 02 May 2026 08:45:18 GMT]]>archer6749 — 14 years ago(December 02, 2011 07:41 PM)

I never heard of Verlaine having anything wrong with his leg, but who knows, maybe he really did.
Proud Leo fan since 1993
leofans.webs.com

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1847468https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1847468Sat, 02 May 2026 08:45:18 GMT