<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Video discussion on straight-to-video sequels including Tremors II]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Tremors II: Aftershocks</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>squabbleboxuk</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 07, 2016 12:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">My latest video production in our Shooting the S#it strand is a look at straight-to-video sequels in which host Ross Hadlington takes a look at the likes of the Anaconda films and Leprechaun in Space. Hope you enjoy:<br />
For the record, Tremors II makes our "good" pile.</p>
<ul>
<li>Dave.<br />
Entertainment under attack at<br />
<a href="http://www.squabblebox.co.uk" rel="nofollow ugc">www.squabblebox.co.uk</a></li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220265/video-discussion-on-straight-to-video-sequels-including-tremors-ii</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 03:30:55 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220265.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 08:56:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>