<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[8.6 is very very high…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Usual Suspects</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>wiki119</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 25, 2015 01:26 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This says that it's better than The Prestige (2006) and The Departed (2006) which is not true imo. Either those movies are underrated or this one overrated. Idk what were the voter thinking while judging this movie. I guess the main difference is, i saw this movie in 2015 and have already watched other thriller/mystery movies while those who gave it a 10 may have watched this movie as the first movie of their lives.<br />
I almost forgot mentioning SAW (2004), the mother of twists.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220385/8-6-is-very-very-high</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:51:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220385.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:46 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dga23</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 19, 2016 07:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Very good - 8.5<br />
"She let me go."<br />
~White Oleander</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849290</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849290</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>yeejunru</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 30, 2016 09:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Usual Suspect got a better screenplay<br />
BOOM!!!<br />
And Saw is not the mother of twist, bitch, maybe you need to watch Hitchcock's Psycho</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849289</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849289</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Klockard23</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 25, 2016 08:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">dude just go check imdb top 250 movies, half of the movies in top 100 are really old and got top in list due to old voters. Take for example Rear Window (1954) making 40th at the list where Memento (2000), Django Unchained (2012), The Prestige (2006), Gladiator (2000), Heat (1995) and many more, which i found more interesting than Rear Window and The Usual Suspects, are underrated imo.<br />
Ever consider the possibility that those films got higher votes because the people voting just simply liked them more? Also, Heat and The Usual Suspects were released in the same year.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849288</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849288</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kjeao</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 25, 2016 07:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Movies released in "old times" don't have more votes and 8.6 is just about right. Or maybe you're right and everyone else is wrong.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849287</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849287</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Stratego</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 25, 2016 12:24 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i am not saying " because i am young i should like new movies ".. definitely not<br />
I never suggested that you were saying that. But you ARE saying that people vote for old movies because they're old themselves. In that case, I could just as well argue that you vote for newer movies because you are young.<br />
Just that movies being released in old times have more votes compared to new ones, so ratings are unfair for new movies..<br />
No, they're not. It's not like people have been able to vote for movies on IMDb since the 1950s. And you're wrong, a movie like The Prestige (2006) has 854.717 votes, while Rear Window (1954) only has 319.746 votes. If anything, I'd argue that the ratings are unfair because older movies have less votes than newer movies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849286</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849286</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wiki119</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 25, 2016 12:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i am not saying " because i am young i should like new movies ".. definitely not<br />
Just that movies being released in old times have more votes compared to new ones, so ratings are unfair for new movies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849285</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849285</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Stratego</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 24, 2016 07:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">half of the movies in top 100 are really old and got top in list due to old voters.<br />
Ever considered you like the movies you mentioned because you're young???</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849284</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849284</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>gottaluvafriend</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 24, 2016 05:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Okay, dude. Just know the being young is okay and so is being old. A person can be both.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849283</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849283</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wiki119</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 24, 2016 11:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">dude just go check imdb top 250 movies, half of the movies in top 100 are really old and got top in list due to old voters. Take for example Rear Window (1954) making 40th at the list where Memento (2000), Django Unchained (2012), The Prestige (2006), Gladiator (2000), Heat (1995) and many more, which i found more interesting than Rear Window and The Usual Suspects, are underrated imo.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849282</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849282</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>gottaluvafriend</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 23, 2016 12:11 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why so you say that had you seen The Usual Suspects in 1995 you'd have liked it more? Just wondering. Which movies are better in your opinion?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849281</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849281</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wiki119</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 23, 2016 12:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i am 22 and my age has nothing to do with my liking lol.<br />
If i watched it back in 1995, i would have definitely liked it more. But after a number of good movies have released i think it's kinda unfair for this movie to have such high rating. i'd give it around 8, but 8.6 is kinda high beats many good movies stuck at 8.5. idk i am just making a point.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849280</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849280</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>gottaluvafriend</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 18, 2016 10:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">How old are you? Maybe when you're older you'll see the movie differently.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849279</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849279</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ironskeletor</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 12, 2016 05:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"SAW (2004), the mother of twists."<br />
Good lord. Saw's is the most anemic plot twist not written by Shyamalan I know. It does exactly nothing to make you reconsider the events of the movie, and demonstrates better than any of Saw's other failings that the writers didn't know what they were doing.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849278</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849278</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dtizzlefosho</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 11, 2016 10:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Not high for the greatest movie ever made.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849277</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849277</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:19:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>milosprole9</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 05, 2016 04:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Gigli<br />
(2003) is a lot better than this movie. It was just goddamn boring!<br />
There's something wrong with Esther.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849276</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849276</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>woodsjimm</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 10, 2015 02:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ermno. As great as the Prestige, Departed, and even Saw actually are, Usual Suspects IS better<br />
The Departed isn't even an original film - If you didn't know, it is a remake of Infernal Affairs</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849275</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849275</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>zgurierion</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 29, 2015 03:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Imagine watching this movie in 1995 you didnt have this kind of ending at that time, after that the twist ending was very fashionable, maybe us those who had watched this movie at that time rate this movie very high.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849274</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849274</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>chris71388</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 17, 2015 12:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Movies are subjective. /end thread</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849273</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849273</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hodie1</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 03, 2015 06:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I don't take the rating system here all that seriously.  I tend to reward films I liked and punish those that I hated.  In 50 years no one will care.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849272</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849272</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hodie1</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 03, 2015 06:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was entertained so much more by The Usual Suspects than by the other two named.  So many little touches. It's a lot of fun and I rarely miss it if it's on.<br />
I think films made before 1990 don't get the attention here that they should.  But it isn't anything I lose sleep over.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849271</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849271</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sextamental</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 30, 2015 06:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This says that it's better than The Prestige (2006) and The Departed (2006)<br />
It is. Simple as that. It is also better than those massively overrated Nolan Bat flicks which have no right in any top ten, but that's another argument.<br />
SPIRAL OUT!..KEEP GOING!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849270</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849270</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>HumanFundRecipient</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 23, 2015 02:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Watched it twice in theaters in the fall of 1995.<br />
Bought the widescreen format VHS when it became available.<br />
Bought the DVD when I was able to watch movies on DVD.<br />
Joined <a href="http://imdb.com" rel="nofollow ugc">imdb.com</a> 12 years ago.<br />
Voted on this movie, gave it a 9/10 at the first opportunity. Likewise, I gave The Departed an 8/10, but The Prestige got a 6/10. I could see that movie being well made/acted and all that sh!t, but I didn't really like it all that much.<br />
It don't matter who you hear it from. It's the same story.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849269</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849269</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hatsAreForLosers</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 09, 2015 09:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You compared this movie to saw. Stopjust stop</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849268</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849268</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 8.6 is very very high… on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jbaddock</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 26, 2015 11:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You may have stumbled upon the truth in that The Usual Suspects pre-dated the films you mentioned. The fact is that it had an impact on most of the 'twist' films that followed it, one way or another, and so deserves credit for that. And as for 'the mother of twists' (SAW), I hate to say it, but I knew<br />
the body on the floor was going to be significant the moment it first appeared on the screen.<br />
In addition, knowing the twist in SAW doesn't make any difference to watching the film a second time, whereas with TUS, you start picking up on all the things that didn't quite add up the first time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849267</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1849267</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:18:48 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>