<![CDATA[Is this the last multimillion dollar Hollywood epic to be filmed practically?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Waterworld

ITTY — 6 years ago(May 14, 2019 07:57 AM)

There was a switch to CGI in the 1990s.
Were there any other multimillion dollar Hollywood epics filmed practically after
Waterworld
?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220464/is-this-the-last-multimillion-dollar-hollywood-epic-to-be-filmed-practicallyRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 16:31:43 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 09:34:29 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Is this the last multimillion dollar Hollywood epic to be filmed practically? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:32 GMT]]>ITTY — 6 years ago(May 14, 2019 10:01 PM)

I like the movie, too.
It actually did pretty well financially worldwide, so it's not really accurate when people say that the movie flopped. I dunno why people dislike the movie so much, I guess it's because they had high expectations because Costner was in some great films back then, and then Waterworld ended up being not as good as his other movies.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850094https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850094Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is this the last multimillion dollar Hollywood epic to be filmed practically? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:31 GMT]]>NZer — 6 years ago(May 14, 2019 08:28 AM)

Waterworld had terrible reviews, but I liked it a lot.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850093https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850093Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Is this the last multimillion dollar Hollywood epic to be filmed practically? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:30 GMT]]>ITTY — 6 years ago(May 14, 2019 08:05 AM)

I think Waterworld might be the last one.
Titanic
came out in 1997 and used CGI.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850092https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850092Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:30 GMT