<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[There was a switch to CGI in the 1990s.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Waterworld</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>ITTY</strong> — <em>6 years ago(May 14, 2019 07:57 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">There was a switch to CGI in the 1990s.<br />
Were there any other multimillion dollar Hollywood epics filmed practically after<br />
Waterworld<br />
?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220465/there-was-a-switch-to-cgi-in-the-1990s</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:53:51 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220465.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to There was a switch to CGI in the 1990s. on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ITTY</strong> — <em>6 years ago(May 14, 2019 10:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I like the movie, too.<br />
It actually did pretty well financially worldwide, so it's not really accurate when people say that the movie flopped. I dunno why people dislike the movie so much, I guess it's because they had high expectations because Costner was in some great films back then, and then Waterworld ended up being not as good as his other movies.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850098</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850098</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to There was a switch to CGI in the 1990s. on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>NZer</strong> — <em>6 years ago(May 14, 2019 08:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Waterworld  had terrible reviews, but I liked it a lot.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850097</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850097</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to There was a switch to CGI in the 1990s. on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ITTY</strong> — <em>6 years ago(May 14, 2019 08:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Waterworld might be the last one.<br />
Titanic<br />
came out in 1997 and used CGI.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850096</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850096</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:34 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>