<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Waterworld fans, Where are you???]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Waterworld</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>antonio_cerruti</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 14, 2016 05:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Only 6.1??? really? You will let this cult movie only get 6.1?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220468/waterworld-fans-where-are-you</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 21:36:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220468.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>filmflaneur</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 18, 2017 06:35 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I give it an 8, especially after seeing the extended cut. Hopper may over do it somewhat but it holds together as an excellent wet western.<br />
I'm well aware that railing does no good<br />
kurt2000</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850125</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850125</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mully1999</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 07, 2017 05:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Gave it a 10, always considered it a great action movie with some great comedy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850124</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850124</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850123</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850123</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Quest_Shield</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 08, 2016 05:33 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">10 from me</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850122</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850122</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>notsocrazyroy</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 12, 2016 02:44 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I must have seen Waterworld four or five times over the years and still find it highly entertaining today. Don't know why it got so badly slammed by critics on its release but I'm glad I ignored them all.<br />
Ok it may have a few flaws as others have mentioned but they aren't important enough to detract from what is essentially an adventure movie and a damned good one at that. It has a strong storyline, the lead characters are all believable, the chase scenes on the water are truly spectacular and all filmed for real without the usual in your face CGI that is par for the course in action movies these days.<br />
I found watching the developing relationship between the mariner and the child extremely touching without being over sentimental, the swimming scene was beautifully done. At the end of the movie I really cared what happened to these people. A great film overall, I scored it 8/10.<br />
The true value of freedom is known only to those who are denied it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850121</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850121</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>undead_ramen</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 06, 2016 05:27 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Loved it when it first came out, still love it today. It's unfortunate that ppl are such sheep they only read what was problematic technically, in 'secret behind the scenes interviews' rather than wait and view the film, and enjoy it.<br />
When you get down to it, this was not a film about the post apocalyptic era, or about the environment, it was about friendship. Most of our personal favorite films are.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850120</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850120</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Cinema_Love</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 24, 2016 07:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Meta critic. Who listen To them. I call them Rotten rejects. Theses sites don't care about The work This industry is doing. I am sure avengers And crappy films like This are in 80%</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850119</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850119</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>badmamerjamer</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 07, 2016 06:58 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">i gave it a 10 also.<br />
sure there are a lot of things to nit pick, but its sci-fi, its fantasy, its to escape reality for a couple of hours, not be scientifically accurate on every detail.<br />
its a great story. <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/2764.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--heart" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title="&lt;3" alt="❤" /> it!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850118</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850118</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>megansmith-257-288551</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 15, 2016 07:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You can't trust any of these ratings I think!<br />
M.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850117</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850117</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Ghenghy</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 13, 2016 05:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I give it an 8. If it was released today it would be heralded as one of the greatest films of all time. Costner was subjected to a lot of unfair criticism back in the day.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850116</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850116</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>david_hokey_16</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 21, 2016 06:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Meta critic users have it at 3.1 which is lower than the critics. I give it a 5/10. Not bad, not good. Average.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850115</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850115</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Waterworld fans, Where are you??? on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pietroricci</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 18, 2016 07:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I gave it a 10.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850114</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850114</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:34:54 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>