<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[.. it isn&#x27;t.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Waterworld</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>DBLurker</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 07, 2016 05:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">.. it isn't.<br />
I avoided watching it for so many years because of the idiots/critics lambasting it as the worst thing ever, but now that I did, it was just entertaining. I actually found it funny, especially interaction between Costner and the girls.<br />
Funniest bit, when Enola starts waving at the Smokers in the plane and Costner slaps her from behind. Hopper did the same later on. I found the whole movie to be just plain fun. Acting didn't bother me, but then again, it takes a special kind of bad acting for me to be bothered by.<br />
7/10<br />
PS: If you want bad movies with terrible "acting", go watch new movies being created for the teens these days. Case in point: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/12304933/reference" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/12304933/reference</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220477/it-isn-t</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 23:50:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220477.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to .. it isn&#x27;t. on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>cobrn-24298</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 08, 2017 07:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree also. The soundtrack wasn't bad either. I did wish they would put out an exntended uncut version. I know they had the extended version on a double DVD a while back but it was the tv aired version. Unfortunately scenes were missing and language was tv friendly.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850160</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850160</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to .. it isn&#x27;t. on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>LeWildPlatypus</strong> — <em>9 years ago(December 12, 2016 04:53 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree, I bought the Blu-ray and it was very good indeed. A solid 7/10 from me also.<br />
I like that boulder. That is a nice boulder.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850159</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850159</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:35:44 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>