<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[This movie is really good. I dont understand why it was shunned so badly back in the day.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Waterworld</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Kt-Leinonen</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 30, 2016 03:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This movie is really good. I dont understand why it was shunned so badly back in the day.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220483/this-movie-is-really-good-i-dont-understand-why-it-was-shunned-so-badly-back-in-the-day</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:58:26 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220483.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:36:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to This movie is really good. I dont understand why it was shunned so badly back in the day. on Sat, 02 May 2026 09:36:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Mhjm6</strong> — <em>9 years ago(November 02, 2016 07:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No clue either, it's amazing for the music alone.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850178</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1850178</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 09:36:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>