<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why isn&#x27;t this in the bottom 100? It deserves a spot on there for sure, it&#x27;s one of the worst movies of the 90&#x27;s.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Bio-Dome</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Darwinskid</strong> — <em>12 years ago(June 21, 2013 11:58 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why isn't this in the bottom 100? It deserves a spot on there for sure, it's one of the worst movies of the 90's.<br />
COOKIES AND MILK!-Ed</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220780/why-isn-t-this-in-the-bottom-100-it-deserves-a-spot-on-there-for-sure-it-s-one-of-the-worst-movies-of-the-90-s</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 18:47:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220780.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 10:24:41 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Why isn&#x27;t this in the bottom 100? It deserves a spot on there for sure, it&#x27;s one of the worst movies of the 90&#x27;s. on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:24:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Diagoro</strong> — <em>12 years ago(June 29, 2013 01:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">lay off the purple sticky punch dude.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1852784</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1852784</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 10:24:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>