<![CDATA[I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Children of the Corn: The Gathering

TrippingABlindMan — 14 years ago(June 27, 2011 04:18 AM)

I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the series, why call it Children of the Corn? Actually come to think of it, they probably would have been sued for ripping off the COTC films due to the setting (small town with kids killing their parents and living in a cornfield).
Anyways one of the better ones of the series

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/220896/i-liked-this-film-decently-creepy-good-deaths-naomi-watts-is-daaammmn-fine-but-it-had-nothing-to-do-at-all-with-theRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 22:16:31 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 10:43:20 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:31 GMT]]>HorrorFanatic24 — 9 years ago(January 15, 2017 03:52 PM)

Then you must have not seen revelation. So boring!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853787https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853787Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:30 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853786https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853786Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:29 GMT]]>smitthhh — 11 years ago(August 27, 2014 07:26 PM)

Halloween III was great! This film is fine but not as good as Urban Harvest.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853785https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853785Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:27 GMT]]>Doc110894 — 11 years ago(July 19, 2014 06:40 PM)

I like COTC IV a little more than back in the day, but still not crazy about it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853784https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853784Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:26 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853783https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853783Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:25 GMT]]>ElectricWarlock — 12 years ago(February 03, 2014 08:29 AM)

I like both this film and Halloween III. Children of the Corn III: Urban Harvest is my favorite of the sequels, but this one is still pretty good. It was cool to see Karen Black in a Children of the Corn movie. She is one of my favorite actresses. And the backstory of Josiah was pretty interesting. I love all the Children of the Corn movies. It is such an underrated horror franchise.
Death lives in the Vault of Horror!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853782https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853782Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:24 GMT]]>HorrorFanatic24 — 9 years ago(January 15, 2017 03:53 PM)

Fields of terror was the best besides part 1. Revelation and Isaac 666 were the worst.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853781https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853781Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:23 GMT]]>sonickid — 14 years ago(November 12, 2011 04:31 PM)

I completely agree; I couldn't stand part VI, although I understand why fans of the series liked it (because of the return of John Franklin).
My IMDb vote history:
http://www.imdb.com/user/ur5998197/ratings

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853780https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853780Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:22 GMT]]>TrippingABlindMan — 14 years ago(June 27, 2011 11:19 AM)

I personally hated 666, definitely the weakest in my eyes, after Fields Of Terror (although Eva Mendes wow and the exploding head scene).
Part 8 is coming out in August, called "Genesis" advance reviews have been positive so far.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853779https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853779Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I liked this film (decently creepy, good deaths, Naomi Watts is daaammmn fine) but it had nothing to do at all with the on Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:21 GMT]]>theSUMMERVILLEslasher — 14 years ago(June 27, 2011 10:18 AM)

I agree. I always put this one up there as being one of the GOOD entries in the series, right after the first two films. 666 is descent ONLY because John Franklin came back.
Everyone's entitled to one good scare

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853778https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1853778Sat, 02 May 2026 10:43:21 GMT