<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[You had me at Hello]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jerry Maguire</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>biggacy4</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 27, 2014 02:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Was this line used in daily life at all before this movie. Or what are the exact origins?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221308/you-had-me-at-hello</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:04:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221308.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:03 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to You had me at Hello on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>spookyrat1</strong> — <em>10 years ago(September 13, 2015 03:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It is one of the same its cool catch phrases from the film.<br />
Extremely cool! And I love the reactions from the female divorcee support group.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857300</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857300</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to You had me at Hello on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>krispykremekiller</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 23, 2016 10:26 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've thought the same, but watching this show on video and cable tv over the years, we hear it. In the theater, you've got one shot to hear it.  It was the best line, the most important line in the movie and she repeats it because of that, I'm sure.  For emphasis, and so all can hear it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857299</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857299</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to You had me at Hello on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>urgeking</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 11, 2016 07:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ah, but to me the "bringing it up a notch" is where the problem is.  If there were such a danger of the line not fully sinking in and, really, couldn't that be true of ANY given line in a movie? then she could have said it<br />
as if she herself didn't realize what she meant until the moment she said it<br />
, which is apparently what Crowe &amp; co. were trying to convey. Like this:  "You had me at hello.<br />
[very brief pause]<br />
You<br />
have<br />
me."<br />
What they DID do, repeating the line in full, makes her sound more<br />
conscious<br />
of the wording than of the emotion itself as if she's aware of what a cool line it is and wants to play it for all it's worth and thus it doesn't seem spontaneous enough.  "Bringing it up a notch" to make sure we get it?  That's what<br />
makes<br />
it sound un-natural.<br />
(Unless they were<br />
trying<br />
to suggest that her character had the line planned in advance.  I doubt it, though.)<br />
Anyway, this is just my opinion, but I stand by it.  Maybe I'll go get some software and do my own edit<br />
not<br />
.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857298</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857298</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to You had me at Hello on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>regahsof</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 09, 2016 08:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I liked the repeat. She says nothing for so long during his speech and then finally says this, it's like wait, what did she say? We hear it, but maybe it doesn't fully sink in. Repeating it brings it up a notch, and we catch its full effect.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857297</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857297</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to You had me at Hello on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>urgeking</strong> — <em>10 years ago(May 09, 2015 10:52 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I just wish I had the ability to do a small edit in that scene.  When she says "You had me at hello" the first time: Great.  The sentiment sounds spontaneous.  We GET it, right away.  But then she goes and<br />
repeats<br />
the line, and it begins to sound planned, rehearsed, like her character is saying it more<br />
for effect<br />
than as an honest expression of feeling.  One time was plenty.  Don't oversell it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857296</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857296</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to You had me at Hello on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>gray187-1</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 02, 2015 05:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No. This line was invented by writer-director Cameron Crowe. It is one of the same its cool catch phrases from the film.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857295</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857295</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:04 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>