<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jerry Maguire</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Rocky63215</strong> — <em>14 years ago(December 23, 2011 05:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221311/for-that-reason-alone-will-not-watch-it-should-have-gone-with-a-better-actor-such-as-the-original-choice-of-tom-hanks</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:58:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221311.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:34 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>RemusMoon</strong> — <em>9 years ago(September 13, 2016 11:30 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I understand as I'm not a Cruise fan either but this is actually one of the few movies I can bear him in. He plays the role well and I definitely can't see Hanks in the role even though he's a far better actor.<br />
You're missing out; it's not a brilliant film but it's definitely worth watching (maybe you've watched it since 2011 but I doubt it).</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857337</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857337</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hnt_dnl</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 23, 2013 09:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Cruise is terrific in this. One of his best roles and performances. Shows he can do comedy. I miss comedies like this one. Nowadays, most comedies are silly with way too much gross-out humor and foul language and people acting like blithering idiots.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857336</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857336</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MayoGalway</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 12, 2016 11:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Baloney! Read the trivia page. It was written with Tom Hanks as JM, but TH was coming off two consecutive oscars and had directing gig scheduled. Just checkout the list of other actors considered. Nowhere is Carrey listed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857335</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857335</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>LtStarbuck99</strong> — <em>13 years ago(January 28, 2013 12:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Can't think of any other reason than the fact he is gorgeous.seriouslymaybe Scientology has a tiny weeny little bit got to do with itbut mostly jealousy..</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857334</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857334</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>manofsteel4455</strong> — <em>13 years ago(January 26, 2013 07:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why are people disliking Tom Cruise so much?<br />
You want to play the game, you'd better know the rules, love.<br />
-Harry Callahan</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857333</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857333</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>LtStarbuck99</strong> — <em>13 years ago(January 03, 2013 12:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Jim Carrey would have done fine on the funny silly bitsbut he can't get himself out of the role of Stanley Ipkiss with the silly faceshe really is a one dimensional actorTom Cruise is more versatile than people give him credit for and he is gorgeous to bootno one else could have layed this role better..I can't believe they had anyone else in mind.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857332</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857332</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lockon_stratos</strong> — <em>13 years ago(January 01, 2013 12:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Jim Carrey was the first choice but passed up on it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857331</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857331</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FMJBoyGenius</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 18, 2014 09:48 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">True. He does that a lot, but I wouldn't say it's that format in every single film. Watch Tropic Thunder, Interview with the Vampire, Minority Report, and Collateral. Those roles are so different. Also, check out Born on the Fourth of July and Magnolia. That formula kinda fits with these two, but they are different, unique, and he's excellent in them!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857330</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857330</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rban321</strong> — <em>13 years ago(November 05, 2012 01:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah Im no Cruise fan by a long shot, but he nailed it in Jerry Maguire.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857329</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857329</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857328</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857328</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>intofilm</strong> — <em>14 years ago(January 13, 2012 12:25 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Tom Cruise "the person" is a real jerk, to the point I no longer look at his movies (though I might if I thought it would be a really first class film).  But I can't imagine any other actor doing a better job at this role.  I think he was remarkable, and showed  a real range in it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857327</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857327</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BlueMoon89</strong> — <em>14 years ago(January 11, 2012 08:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm not a fan of Tom Cruise but he did a great job in this movie.<br />
It's the only one I can stand him in.<br />
Your loss. Just because you don't like an actor, it doesn't mean that they're not good in the movie.<br />
Also, the movie is great for other performances as well. Sad you're so narrow-minded that you won't even give it a chance.<br />
MY BLOG:<br />
<a href="http://www.thelittlethingsmp.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow ugc">www.thelittlethingsmp.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857326</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857326</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>VianneChocolat</strong> — <em>14 years ago(January 03, 2012 09:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's your loss though.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857325</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857325</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to For that reason alone will not watch it. Should have gone with a better actor such as the original choice of Tom Hanks. on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>magitek_elite</strong> — <em>14 years ago(December 23, 2011 03:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">So you're deciding not to watch this fantastic movie because of your prejudice against Tom Cruise? Fail.<br />
It's a good film. I can't imagine anyone BUT Tom Cruise as Jerry Maguire. He inhabited that role Seriously, if you actually watch the film, you'll realize that this part would not have worked well for Hanks. Only Cruise could've pulled it off.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857324</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857324</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:50:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>