<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[&quot;In the annals of unnecessary sequels Lawnmower Man 2 ranks amongst the worst. Rightfully taking its place along side un]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Lawnmower Man 2: Beyond Cyberspace</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>thomashowell</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 16, 2016 03:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"In the annals of unnecessary sequels Lawnmower Man 2 ranks amongst the worst. Rightfully taking its place along side undistinguished company like Blair Witch Project 2, Species II, and Pet Cemetery 2, just to name a few. The only returning member from 1992s Lawnmower Man is Austin O Brien, no longer a silly looking adolescent, but a goofy looking teenager. This is one of the most preposterous movies Ive ever seen, and I have sat through all the Highlander movies, and Super Mario Bros."<br />
Full Review here<br />
<a href="http://moviemavericks.com/2016/03/lawnmower-man-2-beyond-cyberspace-1996-review/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://moviemavericks.com/2016/03/lawnmower-man-2-beyond-cyberspace-1996-review/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221329/in-the-annals-of-unnecessary-sequels-lawnmower-man-2-ranks-amongst-the-worst-rightfully-taking-its-place-along-side-un</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 19:55:52 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221329.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:52:43 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>