<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Lawnmower Man 2: Beyond Cyberspace</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jessehandler</strong> — <em>18 years ago(July 20, 2007 08:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221345/i-was-very-surprised-to-find-this-movie-on-the-bottom-100-list-i-really-liked-it-does-anyone-else-agree</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:52:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221345.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:54:55 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857585</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857585</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Duragizer</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 06, 2014 06:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I liked it  back when I was eleven/twelve.<br />
Suffice it to say, my tastes have been refined since then.<br />
I want to live in a world of magic and miracles, not emptiness and entropy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857584</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857584</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>davebesag</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 21, 2013 04:51 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Six year late reply. Personally, I liked the film but the first film was better. I only saw it once about 15 years ago so perhaps it hasn't aged well. However, I don't know why it's in the bottom 100. I'm a great fan of Matt Frewer from his Max Headroom days so perhaps that's blinded me!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857583</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857583</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:21 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fmaier</strong> — <em>13 years ago(April 23, 2012 12:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, I liked it, it's a fun little watch, only problem I had was that it was a sequel to the Lawnmowerman, because it didn't feel like it. It could have been a great stand-alone movie, but it's not as bad as it's made out to be, in fact the rating surprised me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857582</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857582</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857581</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857581</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>brad-of-mygt</strong> — <em>13 years ago(April 10, 2012 06:35 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well it is kinda like the Matrix to the point too and this came out over a decade earlier<br />
Some of the VR stuff was cool and I love watching movies about technology just because it's always wrong Hackers for ex. LOL.. Firewall with Harrison Ford is the most realistic hacker movie I seen yet<br />
I too can't believe this is on the bottom 100, the first movie was good I mean sure far fetched but the concepts and all<br />
Just hard to see how people can hate on this so much when it's like making a WoW server for people to live in instead of real life, or you could kinda compare it to Surrogates even<br />
I think that just shows how innovative this movie was when it came out!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857580</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857580</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>janX9</strong> — <em>15 years ago(February 07, 2011 08:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yep, not a very good movie LOL<br />
As for HMD's I think there pretty cool especially now with all the Augmented Reality apps there are for cell phones and suckI used to think AR was kind of useless, but I now see how handy it can be, and hopefully will help pave the way for HMD's getting more popular.<br />
grrr arg<br />
h4x0r 7Eh pl4NE7</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857579</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857579</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>drowlord</strong> — <em>15 years ago(January 06, 2011 08:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'd never seen it before today.  It's horrible.<br />
I have a pair of video glasses (I normally see them called HMDs  head mounted displays), and it's still a mediocre technology.  It works okay, though, when I want to watch a movie in bed.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857578</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857578</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>janX9</strong> — <em>15 years ago(November 02, 2010 05:38 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yep, it gets worse every time I see it, I knew it was crap the first time I saw it and yet I still watch it<br />
Probably because I like most movies that have to do with VRfor over 20 years now I've been waiting for VR to get popular and after all this time many people still don't even know what VR goggles areor Video Glasses as they are called now a days.<br />
grrr arg<br />
h4x0r 7Eh pl4NE7</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857577</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857577</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tcshan</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 25, 2010 04:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I liked it the first time around, when I was younger.  I recently saw it again and realized what an insane piece of crap it is.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857576</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857576</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>janX9</strong> — <em>16 years ago(March 29, 2010 10:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">TiggerPromfit I'm not sure if you were directing that at me or in general, but for the record<br />
LMLS WAS terrible, but I still enjoy it from time to time (I have bad tastes). But part one was great. No comparison.<br />
grrr arg<br />
h4x0r 7Eh pl4NE7</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857575</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857575</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TiggerPromfit</strong> — <em>16 years ago(March 29, 2010 09:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This film was terrible, and if you truly think this piece of crap is better than the original, your a complete moron.<br />
Then again Im not surprised. No matter how bad a film can be you will always have a bunch of weirdos that like it or say its better than the first.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857574</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857574</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>janX9</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 19, 2009 09:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, BrainGremlin is right, you haven't really ruined the first one, in fact, the first one may seem better, after having seen LM2.<br />
After you see part one, you will understand why part 2 is rated so badly. The first one was shot like a "real" film, but part two was made to monopolize on the first, they didn't make it comparable to the first at all.<br />
See part one, you won't regret it.<br />
grrr arg<br />
h4x0r 7Eh pl4NE7</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857573</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857573</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BrainGremlin</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 18, 2009 10:06 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Don't worry, DanD. From what I've read, this movie altered events from the first one to fit what is basically a new, seperate story. (Kind of like<br />
Army of Darkness<br />
in that aspect, I suppose. Or rather,<br />
very much<br />
like<br />
Army of Darkness<br />
.)<br />
So go watch<br />
LM1<br />
anyway.<br />
"Everybody relax, I'm here." -<br />
Jack Burton</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857572</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857572</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DanD_Man</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 16, 2009 01:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'm currently watching LM2 right now.  I find it enjoyable.  I don't understand why this movie is rated so badly.  I haven't seen the first one yet.  I guess I kinda ruined it for me but oh well.<br />
I guess we're a minority of movie goers that like (generally) bad movies.<br />
Gordan Ramsey told me to go **** myself!  But I cant reach!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857571</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857571</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>janX9</strong> — <em>17 years ago(February 10, 2009 07:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I liked it, although I have to say it's still a crappy film. This is a film I am stuck watching alone, because I don't know anyone else who likes it. It also doesn't give the first film justice. But I do enjoy it from time to time, when I want a wee bit of eye candy and bad acting.<br />
grrr arg</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857570</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857570</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Zosoerob</strong> — <em>17 years ago(January 23, 2009 12:03 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You guys are crazy. We drunkenly watched this at a party and ripped it to shreds, this and the original are top ten worst films of all time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857569</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857569</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kmb805</strong> — <em>17 years ago(January 10, 2009 09:39 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I like both Lawnmower Man 1 &amp; 2. This sequel is good and funny, because the filmmakers thought, that Virtual Reality would make such a huge change in the future. It's an enjoyable sci-fi movie, we can see evil Jobe here.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857568</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857568</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mick_aka</strong> — <em>18 years ago(February 22, 2008 02:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Very far from the best sequel, but no way this should be making the bottom 100. This is a perfectly watchable, and dare I say it in places an enjoyable movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857567</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857567</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wakizashipink</strong> — <em>18 years ago(February 11, 2008 07:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">As a sequel, it's passable at best.<br />
On its own, it's a fun little cyberpunk adventure. Well worth the couple of bucks you'd spend on it now in any department store bargain rack.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857566</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857566</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:55:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:54:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Elmware</strong> — <em>18 years ago(January 09, 2008 11:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, it wasn't a bad movie but I still like the first one way better.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857565</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857565</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:54:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:54:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Horde Mode</strong> — <em>18 years ago(December 27, 2007 05:32 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">As a sequel to The Lawnmower Man it's terrible, but if taken on its own merits its a breezy, enjoyable little movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857564</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857564</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:54:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:54:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857563</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857563</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:54:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to I was very surprised to find this movie on the bottom 100 list. I really liked it. Does anyone else agree? on Sat, 02 May 2026 11:54:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>perrymehta1</strong> — <em>18 years ago(September 17, 2007 06:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">yeah i liked both actually. 2 was better i thought. i've seen worse. house of the dead 1 and 2. hellraiser 4-8. (1-3 were decent. etc.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857562</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1857562</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 11:54:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>