<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Mulholland Falls</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Dana2004</strong> — <em>20 years ago(April 11, 2005 03:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot.<br />
Which is the better movie Mulholland Falls or L.A. Confidential?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221523/both-set-in-the-50s-los-angeles-both-have-great-casts-great-plot</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 21:21:35 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221523.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:28:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>majohnson22000</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 09, 2016 11:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Mulholland Falls by far in every category.<br />
X</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859387</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859387</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>DracTarashV</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 14, 2014 01:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">L.A. Confidential is probably the greater film (better script, direction, character development), but I personally prefer Mulholland Falls. To me, MF is a slightly more captivating film with better visuals, drama, and more intense fight scenes. Plus, the cast is just marvelous: Nolte, Palminteri, and the ravishing J Connelly give terrific performances that are just as good as, if not better than, the ones in LAC. But above all, the 1950s in MF actually looked authentic compared to LAC; a modern car driving by in the latter wouldn't have looked so out of place (I do like the look and style of the film nonetheless).<br />
Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859386</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859386</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mgtbltp</strong> — <em>11 years ago(August 31, 2014 02:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Mulholland Falls<br />
a slight edge, it got the hats right, though both are good.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859385</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859385</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Noirdame79</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 16, 2014 02:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree with those who say<br />
L.A. Confidential<br />
is the superior film. It certainly held my interest more than<br />
Mulholland Falls<br />
.<br />
L.A. Confidential<br />
is a winning example of neo-noir done right, almost to perfection. The performances, direction, script, music, cinematography and recreation of the period (costumes, sets, locations, etc) is to die for, pardon the expression. And the plot was intriguing.<br />
Mulholland Falls<br />
isn't a bad movie. I think it had tremendous potential. Unfortunately, a few things didn't work for me. The military stuff, the poor use of Jennifer Connelly (I'm a straight female, but I'm not blind to her appeal and what it would have added to the film if she had appeared in more than just flashbacks) and miscasting in some roles. It could have been a much better movie.<br />
Chinatown, L.A. Confidential, Hollywoodland<br />
and<br />
Changeling<br />
get my votes for best neo-noir (although<br />
Changelin<br />
g is set in the late 1920s to the early 1930s).</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859384</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859384</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>first-things-first</strong> — <em>12 years ago(September 14, 2013 11:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I pick LA Confidential. That movie showed humanity at it's worst. How the good we're manipulated for the greater good - to eliminate organized crime and how the bad has many faces. That power without a conscious is dangerous. In Mulholland Falls there was redemption and debts paid by the protagonists and antagonists. In LA Confidential it was business as usual, with different players.<br />
she loved poetry and romance, but she hit the glass ceiling at birth</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859383</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859383</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>csteve67</strong> — <em>13 years ago(March 19, 2013 08:57 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">L.A. Confidentialbetter storyline, way better acting, not as easy to figure the plot, more action.<br />
"Vive la mort, vive la guerre, vive le sacre mercenaire."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859382</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859382</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>crooked_spoons</strong> — <em>13 years ago(September 24, 2012 05:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">L.A. Confidential. And I never even really liked L.A. Confidential.<br />
Simply put, LAC has charisma and relies more on the actors than set design and costumes. It has a story that's gritty in a way that goes beyond a nostalgia piece or cheesy vanity project. It feels like an original film made for adults, whereas Mulholland Falls comes off as remake of some long forgotten film noir rewritten with some nudity to make it palatable for modern audiences.<br />
I don't know, something about Mulholland Falls feels empty. Shallow where, with so much talent on the screen, there should have been depth. The whole way through it felt like each scene began just after the director finished reminding the actors they were playing a movie set in the 50s and instructing them to 'make it feel classic-y'. Something about MF feels seems disingenuous, almost as if Dragnet had tits and swear words and nothing more.<br />
Now frankly I never thought LAC was the masterpiece many said it was but in a side by side comparison with this, it's a modern classic.</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">Everybody needs love. Have you held your hostage today?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859381</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859381</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jones7418</strong> — <em>13 years ago(August 24, 2012 09:15 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I love them both but clearly, L A Confidential had more style.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859380</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859380</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>franzkabuki</strong> — <em>13 years ago(May 14, 2012 02:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Falls isnt bad necessarily, but L.A.Confidential is indeed superior in pretty much every department one can think of. The story of MF doesnt ultimately add up to much and the little eccentrities it insists on employing from time to time - like all that Palminteris psychiatrist stuff and bizarre behaviour exhibited by some characters - is just silly and distracting. Its also ridiculous how a 50-year old Nick Nolte is made into an action hero seemingly capable of beating up an entire army single handedly. But, yeah, its at least pretty look at and reasonably engaging most of the time. Worthy of something like a 6,5/10 rating.<br />
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859379</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859379</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BB-15</strong> — <em>13 years ago(May 05, 2012 10:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"Both have great casts"<br />
I thought so.</p>
<ul>
<li>For me I liked Mulholland Falls better. I enjoy old fashioned crime mysteries. I don't mind that they take their time and that they don't become action movies. The focus in this kind of film is the mystery about the crime and having the detective figure it out.</li>
<li>I remember that the critics loved Kim Bassinger in L.A. Confidential but I didn't think she gave an Oscar caliber performance.</li>
<li>L.A. Confidential also has a big shoot out scene at the end. This is popular for lots of the audience who enjoy action. For me that action movie style scene got in the way of the story.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>But Mulholland Falls was not as popular with L.A. Confidential. Imo MF not only didn't have as much action but MF also shows some parts of the US military in a negative way. I think some of the audience did not appreciate that. I was OK with the military backstory of MF because I knew it was based on real events involving atomic bomb testing.<br />
BB <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f609.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--wink" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=";-)" alt="😉" /><br />
it's just in my opinion - imo -</li>
</ul>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859378</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859378</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Kieselguhr</strong> — <em>14 years ago(March 26, 2012 10:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">L.A. confidential had the edge.<br />
for example, when spacey bought the farm.<br />
No warning; total shocker.<br />
Good movie that.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859377</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859377</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>RemiRoyer33</strong> — <em>14 years ago(March 14, 2012 04:14 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">L.A. Confidential is full of itself, it tries too hard to be 50's and noir-edgy whereas Mulholland Falls is subtle but more effective.<br />
I go with Mulholland Falls as the superior film.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859376</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859376</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>degree7</strong> — <em>14 years ago(August 24, 2011 11:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Mulholland Falls is a far more authentic and realistic drama of the period, rather than the over-praised LA Confidential.<br />
It has better acting as well.<br />
I said I never had much use for one.never said I didn't know how to use it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859375</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859375</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Captain_Augustus_McCrae</strong> — <em>14 years ago(June 05, 2011 06:07 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">LA Confidential takes it by a nose. I really liked both films, and Jennifer C. is<br />
unbelievably hot in Mulholland Falls (far more so than Kim Basinger in LA Confidential, IMHO), but LA Confidential is the better film by a bit. I'm in the middle of a "Noir" bender right now, and I can't get enough of this type of film.<br />
"It ain't dying I'm talking about, it's living!!!"<br />
Augustus McCrae</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859374</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859374</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mgtbltp</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 03, 2014 05:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just Sid Huggens &amp; Dudley Smith sport the fedoras in LAC.<br />
If you watch Crime Wave watch it with the commentary from Eddie Muller &amp; James Ellroy.<br />
I'll quote the author James Ellroy on his commentary on the DVD for Crime Wave "Sterling Hayden That is my Bud White. That is my Bud White! (expletive) Russell Crowe in 'L A Confidential.' I mean he was okay, but he's a shrimpy little (expletive) Bud White as Bud Whites go. Sterling Hayden is the real deal. Look at this! He's not even acting. Look at that hat!" lol 'nuff said.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859373</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859373</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mgtbltp</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 03, 2014 05:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Just Sid Huggens &amp; Dudley Smith sport the fedoras in LAC.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859372</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859372</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>filmbuff1974</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 01, 2014 03:21 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"But L.A. Confidential forgot the hats, a glaring omission, it was like making a Western without cowboy hats. "mgtbltp<br />
You know mgtbltp, that is a damn good call. I didn't catch it. I think I'm going to watch these movies again and compare them to actual period Noir films.<br />
Live Full &amp; Die Empty. Tap Your Potential and Realize Your Dreams!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859371</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859371</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mgtbltp</strong> — <em>11 years ago(September 01, 2014 03:43 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"L.A. Confidential" had way more money to work with and it showed in the production design. This is the rare case where money really does become a deciding factor on how good a film was, these period films need to sell us the time period. BTW, don't get me wrong, "Mulholland Falls" is a pretty impressive film and I really enjoyed it. It's just there wasn't much to sell me on the fifties time period except the period cars and the military sequences.<br />
But L.A. Confidential forgot the hats, a glaring omission, it was like making a Western without cowboy hats.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859370</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859370</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>filmbuff1974</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 21, 2010 02:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">"L.A. Confidential" had way more money to work with and it showed in the production design. This is the rare case where money really does become a deciding factor on how good a film was, these period films need to sell us the time period. BTW, don't get me wrong, "Mulholland Falls" is a pretty impressive film and I really enjoyed it. It's just there wasn't much to sell me on the fifties time period except the period cars and the military sequences.<br />
If you love and support Michael Jackson 100%, copy &amp; paste this into your signature. We love MJ!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859369</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859369</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>fnj2002</strong> — <em>16 years ago(March 04, 2010 04:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Both are superb.  I couldn't choose between them.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859368</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859368</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mgtbltp</strong> — <em>11 years ago(August 31, 2014 09:23 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Mulholland Falls by far I've always though L.A. Confidential was over-rated. This visuals and wardrobe and feel of MH is far, far more authentic!<br />
Agree ^^^ I'm likening better every time I see it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859367</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859367</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wiking5</strong> — <em>16 years ago(September 01, 2009 11:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I can't choose, love 'em both.  Anything else out there this good that fits this time period?<br />
"We all have it coming kid."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859366</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859366</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Juststand</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 04, 2009 09:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Mulholland Falls by far I've always though L.A. Confidential was over-rated. This visuals and wardrobe and feel of MH is far, far more authentic!<br />
What you see (and have seen) is what you get  and have!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859365</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859365</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Both set in the 50s Los Angeles. Both have great casts, great plot. on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859364</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859364</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:29:02 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>