<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Is this movie good enough to only watch for…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Mulholland Falls</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>You-No</strong> — <em>16 years ago(May 30, 2009 07:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Jennifer Connelly nude? This movie looks pretty bad so if I am just watching it for that, would I be ok?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221580/is-this-movie-good-enough-to-only-watch-for</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 16:37:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/221580.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:35:39 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is this movie good enough to only watch for… on Sat, 02 May 2026 12:35:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>externaltestaccount</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 13, 2012 12:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This movie is not bad, it's just not of the caliber of Chinatown and L.A. Confidential. And Jennifer Connelly is not really in it enough. She has never looked better than here.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859721</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1859721</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 12:35:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>