<![CDATA[Why no Oscar Nomination]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Anaconda

JoshBrolinsMustache — 19 years ago(June 08, 2006 09:44 PM)

John Voight delivered the performance of a lifetime. Worthy of an Oscar in my opinion.
JOKING

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/222557/why-no-oscar-nominationRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 17:08:54 GMTSat, 02 May 2026 14:49:36 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:50 GMT]]>Coconut_Kaasa — 16 years ago(March 26, 2010 05:54 PM)

Roger Ebert seemed to think so too. He gave the movie a thumbs up. In his review he mentioned in all seriousness that Voight should have been nominated for it, but of course he wasn't, because the Academy looks past things like this.
~Hey Arnold!~

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866936https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866936Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:49 GMT]]>xsparkle_motionx — 16 years ago(March 14, 2010 10:44 PM)

Haha, yes, massive constipated face. Why cant I look away from this movie? Its like a train wreck.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866935https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866935Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:48 GMT]]>cynicphile — 16 years ago(February 21, 2010 06:45 PM)

So I take it I'm not alone in thinking that he looked perpetually constipated. As if something really bad was happening "down there" but he was trying to hide it with "I'm a really tough guy" facial expressions.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866934https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866934Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:47 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866933https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866933Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:46 GMT]]>bigbadwolf666 — 7 years ago(May 25, 2018 09:15 PM)

lol. and this movie is so much better.
Without strife, your victory has no meaning.
Without strife, you do not advance.
Without strife, there is only stagnation.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866932https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866932Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:45 GMT]]>tincel1372 — 16 years ago(November 05, 2009 11:38 PM)

worst couple
hahaha that's hilarious, thanks for sharing

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866931https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866931Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:44 GMT]]>DaVooz — 16 years ago(August 08, 2009 04:58 AM)

Well
Anaconda
was nominated for 6 (SIX!) Razzie Awards, and not won any (1998)
http://www.imdb.com/board/10118615/awards
The snake was in categories:
Worst New Star
"The Animatronic Anaconda"
Worst Screen Couple
Jon Voight
"The Animatronic Anaconda"
Jon Voight and 'The Animatronic Anaconda'.
http://www.imdb.com/Sections/Awards/Razzie_Awards/1998

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866930https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866930Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:43 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866929https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866929Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:42 GMT]]>almaqueloide — 17 years ago(February 28, 2009 02:57 PM)

Or J.Lo for Best Butt (new category) LOL 😄

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866928https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866928Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:41 GMT]]>DeuceWild_77 — 18 years ago(February 03, 2008 08:23 AM)

..i think the SNAKE should've been nominated

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866927https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866927Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:40 GMT]]>Don_Rafael_Montero — 19 years ago(July 26, 2006 10:18 PM)

John Voight gave a performance that rivals any past best actor nomination!
Put the bunny back in the box.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866926https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866926Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:39 GMT]]>soccerstar5677-1 — 19 years ago(July 25, 2006 10:22 PM)

but they won't be racist to the snakes from, "Snakes On A Plane"
iiiiiiiiiiiyoooooooooo

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866925https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866925Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Why no Oscar Nomination on Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:37 GMT]]>TheReverendCloutier — 19 years ago(July 18, 2006 06:04 AM)

Dude, the academy are so racist against giant snakes.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866924https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1866924Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:37 GMT